My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8A Public
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2025
>
Packet 20250721
>
8A Public
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2025 10:01:31 AM
Creation date
9/16/2025 10:00:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
Document Date (6)
7/21/2025
Retention
Perm
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />City of San Leandro Page 4-2 <br />Parks Development Impact Fee Study <br />May 14, 2025 <br />Collection of Fees. Section 66007(a) provides that a local agency shall not require payment of fees <br />by developers of residential projects prior to the date of final inspection, or issuance of a certificate <br />of occupancy, whichever occurs first. <br />However, "utility service fees" (not defined, but likely referring to water and sewer connections) may <br />be collected upon application for utility service. In a residential development project of more than <br />one dwelling unit, Section 66007 (a) allows the agency to choose to collect fees either for individual <br />units or for phases upon final inspection, or for the entire project upon final inspection of the first <br />dwelling unit completed. <br />Section 66007 (b) provides two exceptions when the local agency may require the payment of fees <br />from developers of residential projects at an earlier time: (1) when the local agency determines that <br />the fees “will be collected for public improvements or facilities for which an account has been <br />established and funds appropriated and for which the local agency has adopted a proposed <br />construction schedule or plan prior to final inspection or issuance of the certificate of occupancy” or <br />(2) the fees are “to reimburse the local agency for expenditures previously made.” <br />Statutory restrictions on the time at which fees may be collected do not apply to non-residential <br />development. <br />Notwithstanding the foregoing restrictions, some cities collect impact fees for all facilities at the time <br />building or grading permits are issued, and builders may find it convenient to pay the fees at that <br />time. <br />In cases where the fees are not collected upon issuance of building permits, Sections 66007 (c) (1) <br />and (2) provide that the City may require the property owner to execute a contract to pay the fee, <br />and to record that contract as a lien against the property until the fees are paid. <br />Earmarking and Expenditure of Fee Revenue. Section 66006 (a) mandates that fees be deposited <br />“with other fees for the improvement in a separate capital facilities account or fund in a manner to <br />avoid any commingling of the fees with other revenues and funds of the local agency, except for <br />temporary investments, and expend those fees solely for the purpose for which the fee was <br />collected.” Section 66006 (a) also requires that interest earned on the fee revenues be placed in the <br />capital account and used for the same purpose. <br />Common practice is to maintain separate funds or accounts for impact fee revenues by facility <br />category (i.e., streets, park improvements), but not for individual projects. <br />Impact Fee Exemptions, Reductions, and Waivers. In the event that a development project is found <br />to have no impact on facilities for which impact fees are charged, such project must be exempted <br />from the fees. <br />If a project has characteristics that will make its impacts on a particular public facility or <br />infrastructure system significantly and permanently smaller than the average impact used to <br />calculate impact fees in this study, the fees should be reduced accordingly to meet the requirement <br />that there must be a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the <br />public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. The fee reduction is <br />required if the fee is not proportional to the impact of the development on relevant public facilities.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.