Laserfiche WebLink
SYSTEM EVALUATION, CAPACITY ASSURANCE, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS <br />© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. Sewer System Management Plan licensed for San Leandro use only. Page 46 of 57 <br />tops of the pipes). Figure ES-4 of the Master Plan shows the capacity assessment results for future peak wet <br />weather flow conditions, indicating existing trunk sewers that were predicted by the model to be surcharged <br />due to “throttle” conditions (peak flow exceeding full pipe capacity) or due to backwater from a <br />downstream throttle condition, and locations of where the model predicts a surcharge condition severe <br />enough to violate the City’s capacity criteria (defined as water level within four feet of manhole rims). Most <br />of these locations were also predicted to be capacity issues under existing peak wet weather flows. <br />The model predicted that no overflows would occur under design storm conditions, and no surcharge under <br />peak dry weather flows. Furthermore, all the modeled pump stations have adequate firm capacity (capacity <br />with largest pumping unit out of service) to convey the predicted peak wet weather flow without violating <br />freeboard criteria or resulting in sewer overflows, although for two of the stations (Bermuda and <br />Teagarden), some backup surcharge may occur. <br />The model included a “time to overflow” analysis of five lift stations. The results showed that all the lift <br />stations appear to have adequate time to avoid overflows under a shutdown due to a power outage, based <br />on the expected time it would take City staff to reach the stations after receiving an alarm and activate an <br />on-site backup generator or connect to a portable generator. For the smaller stations, due to limited data <br />with which to accurately determine the storage capacity in the upstream sewers, the modeling was not <br />sufficiently conclusive to quantitatively assess the time to overflow under a wet weather event. <br />Spill data from the past several years do not indicate that dry weather capacity is a major contributor to <br />spill events. However, it appears that I/I is a contributor to spill events during wet weather. The City intends <br />to develop a procedure to identify wet weather capacity problems. <br />EFFECTIVENESS <br />The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element: <br />• Number of capacity-related spills or surcharge condition during the audit period. <br />• Has the system responded to rain events as indicated by the hydraulic model? <br />• Has there been any changes to zoning designations (residential, commercial, industrial)? <br />IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE <br />No Plan Schedule Responsible Party <br /> Mgr. Eng Sup <br />8.2.1 Monitor/evaluate significant rain <br />events to see if they exceed the <br />design storm in the hydraulic model. <br />Each significant rain evet <br /> X X <br />8.2.2 Monitor flows in each basin and <br />update the hydraulic model <br />Per Engineering Department <br />schedule X <br />8.2.3 Develop a procedure to identify wet <br />weather capacity problems. <br />Beginning in 2026 <br />X X X <br />