My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2026-021 Discipline - Councilmember Aguilar
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2026
>
Reso 2026-021 Discipline - Councilmember Aguilar
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2026 9:42:18 AM
Creation date
3/4/2026 9:37:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
3/2/2026
Retention
PERM
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
597
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />11 <br /> <br /> At the same time, Mayor Gonzalez had to appoint City Council Members to committees <br />and intergovernmental agencies, so he asked every member for their preferences. He noted <br />that unlike other organizations, the Alameda County Stop Waste Board actually pays Board <br />Members for their attendance at their meetings, so it may be one reason why such an <br />appointment is coveted by Council Members. Gonzalez decided to appoint Bowen to that board <br />based in part on the fact that she previously worked with Stop Waste in her leadership role at <br />her former non-profit organization, Community Impact Labs. This meant that Simon, who had <br />been serving on the Board for years, would no longer serve on that board, which upset him. <br /> <br /> According to Viveros-Walton, Simon accused Mayor Gonzalez of taking the only African <br />American off the Stop Waste Board, implying that racial bias was behind this decision, but <br />Viveros-Walton supported Bowen’s appointment to that Board so that Bowen would have the <br />opportunity to serve in a leadership role for that organization — and not because of any racial <br />bias against Simon. <br /> <br /> Simon acknowledged that he had a conversation with Bowen when they discussed his <br />selection as the Vice Mayor in 2024 as the most senior member of the City Council who had not <br />yet had an opportunity to serve in that capacity. He initially stated that he recalled discussing a <br />rotational process for Vice Mayor based on seniority but then claimed that he did not recall if <br />Bowen allowed him to be Vice Mayor in exchange for his agreement to support her nomination <br />in 2025. Simon reasoned that if the selection should be based solely on seniority, then Aguilar, <br />who has the longest tenure, should have been selected instead of Bowen, despite the fact that <br />Aguilar had already previously served as Vice Mayor. Simon contends that the rule contained in <br />the Council Member’s Handbook: “The Vice Mayor will be designated by seniority, seniority is to <br />be defined by date sworn into office,” does not require the selection of the most senior member <br />who had not yet served as Vice Mayor. But his interpretation of the rule undercuts the intent <br />behind enacting it since the impetus for the creation and adoption of the rule was to provide <br />every Council Member an opportunity to serve on a rotational basis as Vice Mayor based on <br />seniority. It was not designed to allow a City Council Member with the longest tenure to be <br />selected repeatedly, effectively foreclosing the opportunity for other Council Members to serve <br />in such capacity. Furthermore, Simon had sought the Vice Mayor position in 2024 because he <br />was the City Council Member with the most seniority who had not yet served as Vice Mayor. <br />This is precisely why Bowen had stepped aside to afford him this opportunity to be Vice Mayor <br />last year, as corroborated by Gonzalez and Ballew. <br /> <br /> Simon also contends that Bowen lacks leadership qualities to be Vice Mayor because <br />she is not fair or impartial. He claims that during the censure process, Bowen made untrue <br />statements when she allegedly stated that Simon had criticized Cameron about issues that were <br />outside the scope of her work. Simon heard from someone else that Cameron had an <br />unprofessional interaction with a Spanish Television station reporter, which is part of the reason <br />he did not support her appointment to City Manager. But Simon concedes that he did not know <br />that Cameron was following City protocols about media interviews or that Robustelli, her direct <br />supervisor at the time, had instructed Cameron not to speak to the press on behalf of the City. <br />Simon did not consider that was outside the scope of Cameron’s duties for which Bowen might <br />have been alluding. Instead, he accuses Bowen of lying, which he believes led to his censure <br />by the City Council. However, his rationale reveals his motive to seek retribution over Bowen’s <br />alleged statements, which he believes resulted in his censure by the City Council. <br /> <br /> Both Boldt and Azevedo recall that Simon had shared his plans to vote against Bowen’s <br />nomination for Vice Mayor, regardless of what the rule stated. Azevedo recalls that Simon said <br />that he would not vote for Bowen to be Vice Mayor because Simon said that she is a liar, and <br />Boldt recalls telling Simon that “he was a dummy” for trying to obstruct Bowen from being <br />selected as Vice Mayor. Boldt also told Simon that he was going to create more havoc by <br />obstructing Bowen’s path to Vice Mayor, but Simon said that he was entitled to his vote, even <br />though there was a clear rule and rotational process in place for the selection of the next Vice <br />Mayor. Such evidence suggests that Simon deliberately voted to block Bowen from becoming <br />Exhibit A <br />Resolution No. 2026-021 Page 11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.