Laserfiche WebLink
FIRST AMENDMENT OF LEASE BETWEEN THE <br /> CITY OF SAN LEANDRO and APPLE INNS,INC. related to <br /> THE MARINA INN,SAN LEANDRO, CALIFORNIA <br /> 61 <br /> ay <br /> THIS First AMENDMENT OF LEASE is made and entered into this /1�-, t Of <br /> September 2017, by and between the CITY OF SAN LEANDRO, a municipal corporation, <br /> hereinafter referred to as "City" or "Lessor" and APPLE INNS, INC., a California corporation, <br /> hereinafter called "Lessee." Lessee owns, maintains, and operates THE NLARINA INN, at 68 <br /> Monarch Drive, San Leandro, California(the"Marina Inn Property"). <br /> RECITALS <br /> A. Lessee owns, maintains, and operates the Marina Inn Property pursuant to a ground lease <br /> entered into between the City and the Lessee approved by the City of San Leandro City Council on <br /> April 2, 1984,and executed April 5, 1984 (the"Lease"). <br /> B. On or about July 20, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2015-125 (the <br /> "Resolution") certifying the Environmental Impact Report (the "EIR.7), adopting mitigation <br /> findings, findings concerning alternatives, a statement of overriding considerations and a mitigation <br /> monitoring program under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") for the specific <br /> activities and approvals that collectively constitute the "San Leandro Shoreline Development <br /> Project"described in Chapter 3 of the EIR(the"Project"). <br /> C. On or about August 18, 2015, the Coalition for the San Leandro Shoreline filed a verified <br /> petition for writ of mandate ("Petition") against the City entitled Coalition for the San Leandro <br /> Shoreline, an unincorporated association v. City of San Leandro, City Council of San Leandro and <br /> Does I through 10, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG 15782404 (the "Action"), in <br /> which it alleged that the City had violated CEQA by its actions approving the Resolution. <br /> D. On or about June 8, 2016, the City filed an answer to the Petition in the Action, in which the <br /> City denied all of the material allegations in the Petition and asserted affirmative defenses. <br /> E. On July 11, 2017,the parties to the Action reached a settlement to resolve all issues related to the <br /> Action, the Resolution, and the Project(collectively, the"Dispute"), in accordance with the terms of <br /> a settlement agreement. The settlement agreement resolves all issues relating to the Dispute. <br /> F. Petitioner dismissed the Action effective July 13,2017. <br /> G. This First Amendment of Lease executes several of the terms of the July 11, 2017 settlement <br /> agreement. <br /> WHEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby <br /> acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: <br />