My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes 2005 0502
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
Minutes 2005 0502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2006 12:43:18 PM
Creation date
4/28/2006 12:38:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minutes
Document Date (6)
5/2/2005
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MINUTES Page 7 <br />City of San Leandro City Council and San Leandro Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting-May 2, 2005 <br /> <br />Councilmember Stephens commented that while there are positive aspects to the <br />project, he understands the concerns that have been expressed. He agreed that the <br />matter should be referred to the Business Development Committee for review. <br /> <br />Councilmember Santos agreed with the comments made by Councilmember Stephens <br />and noted that the Council did not have enough information to fully understand the pros <br />and cons of this type ofproject. He suggested referring the matter to either the Planning <br />Commission or the Board of Zoning Adjustments, whichever had the authority to hear <br />the matter. <br /> <br />Mayor Young concurred with Councilmember Nardine's observations regarding the <br />General Plan. She invited the applicant to make comments. <br /> <br />Gaye Quinn, representing 433 Estudillo LLC, addressed the City Council, <br />apologizing for any confusion on the matter. She stated that the building tenants are <br />currently under leases, and they have been notified in writing that their leases will be <br />honored if they do not wish to purchase their condominiums. The plan for the building <br />is to retain the existing use as a medical office building, and Ms. Quinn indicated that <br />she did not believe the current zoning would allow the types of uses about which the <br />Council had expressed concerns. Additionally, she noted that the building is <br />approximately 80% occupied by medical and dental uses, and most of the interest <br />expressed has also been for medical or dental uses. <br /> <br />Ms. Quinn noted that the building was built in 1968 and has been under-maintained for <br />a long time. She stated that their goal is to reposition the building in the marketplace, so <br />that the occupying businesses have a stake in the community and can control their costs. <br />Ms. Quinn noted that a tenant can purchase a unit and lease it to its corporation, for <br />which it receives tax benefits. She pointed out that the conversion presents an unusual <br />opportunity to the existing tenants, and most of the tenants have indicated that they are <br />very interested in purchasing their units. Ms. Quinn stated that many of the tenants have <br />not been pleased with the way the building has been maintained, and she indicated that <br />the plans submitted to the City include about $1 million in improvements to the <br />building. <br /> <br />Mayor Young noted that there was both the issue of this project, which she suggested be <br />referred to the Planning Commission for a recommendation, and the issue of a general <br />policy regarding rental-to-ownership conversion of commercial buildings. Mr. Horn <br />clarified that the Planning Commission does not have authority over the Zoning Code, <br />but the matter could be referred to the Commission for comment and recommendation. <br />Mayor Young expressed concern about referring the proj ect to the Business <br />Development Committee, noting that it would delay the process for the applicant. <br /> <br />Regarding Ms. Finberg's request to allow the business community the opportunity to <br />address this matter, Councilmember Starosciak indicated that she felt the Business <br />Development Committee would be the appropriate venue for the discussion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.