Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Alameda Countywide Homeless and Special Needs Housing Plan <br /> <br />61 <br /> <br />A number of concerns related to Board and Care homes have been identified in this process: <br /> <br />· The number of Board and Care homes for people with mental illness has been steadily <br />decreasing, due to the retirement of aging owners, and demand for the real estate the homes <br />occupy. Most importantly, the state's reimbursement rates for serving people with <br />developmental disabilities are up to five times higher than for serving people with mental <br />illness, leading to the conversion of many ARFs to serving people with developmental <br />disabilities.63 <br /> <br />· There is no mechanism in place to assist residents to develop independent living skills and <br />move on from Board and Care homes to more independent living. <br /> <br />· Because Board and Care homes are affordable on SSI income, and few other affordable housing <br />options are available for people with mental illness, some residents who might be successful <br />in a more independent setting remain in Board and Care homes. This both limits their <br />potential and prevents people appropriate for a Board and Care homes from accessing the <br />resource. <br /> <br />Unlicensed boarding homes are subject to many concerns about the quality of life for their <br />residents and the surrounding communities. These homes can be attractive to residents because <br />they leave residents with more discretionary income than licensed facilities.64 In 2002, for example, <br />a resident of a licensed Board and Care home paid their entire SSI payment, $918, while a resident <br />of an unlicensed boarding home paid $500 to $750 and had $168 to $418 for incidental expenses.65 <br />Legally, independent boarding homes can provide room and board, but are prohibited from <br />providing care, but some boarding homes provide illegal care without appropriate oversight. There <br />are no regulations about staffing or care, which can create an unstable situation for residents and the <br />surrounding community. <br /> <br />In addition, some boarding homes are improperly maintained and have unsafe and/or unsanitary <br />conditions that can endanger residents. Despite the quality concerns, a substantial portion of people <br />with mental illness live in unlicensed boarding homes. Although a complete count of boarding <br />homes is not available, Oakland had 86 in 2002, compared to about 100 Board and Care homes.66 <br />Because oftheir extremely low incomes and disabilities, unlicensed boarding home residents would <br />otherwise be at high risk of homelessness. <br /> <br />63 Michele Byrnes, Mandy Folse, Ruth Genn, and Michael Thompson, Richard and Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy, <br />University of California at Berkeley, Substandard Board and Care: Addressing Inadequate Facilities in Oakland, May 2002, p. 6. <br />Sponsored by Daphne Markham, Oakland Police Department in collaboration with Calvin Wong and Leslie Gould, City of Oakland <br />Community and Economic Development Agency. <br />64 Ibid, p. 5. <br />65 Ibid, p. 5, Table I. SSI recipients who are residents of non-medical board and care receive a larger monthly payment than people <br />with an "independent living status." For example, in the second halfof2005, a disabled person with an independent living status <br />receives $812 per month, while a person living in a non-medical board and care receives $991. Source: Social Security <br />Administration, "Supplemental Security Income (SSI) in California," January 2005. Available online: <br />www.ssa.gov/pubs/II125.html#pay (Accessed: June 29, 2005). <br />66 Byrnes, p. 3. <br />