Laserfiche WebLink
<br />80 <br /> <br />Alameda Countywide Homeless and Special Needs Housing Plan <br /> <br />Financing Supportive Housing <br /> <br />Producing affordable housing linked with services is not an easy task. Financing permanent <br />supportive housing for long-term homeless and special needs populations is complicated and <br />expensive. For example, several funding sources must participate in order to complete a housing <br />development; no one source of funding will pay for all ofthe housing development costs. Housing <br />developers must leverage funding from conventional bank loans, federal, state, and local <br />government loans and grants, and contributions from private foundations and organizations, and <br />secure ongoing rental subsidies. It is not unusual for nonprofit housing developers to access ten to <br />twelve financing sources per project. In Alameda County, local funding sources typically make up <br />about a third of the total funding required to develop affordable and supportive housing. <br />While leveraging has some advantages-it decreases the amount of local funding required and <br />spreads risks-it makes the development process more complex and increases costs. Every layer of <br />financing adds different conditions, requirements, and monitoring criteria. Funds are usually <br />targeted for specific types of projects (such as transitional or permanent housing), specific uses <br />(such as housing development or support service delivery), and/or specific target populations. The <br />applications themselves can be lengthy, there is intense competition for every source, and funding <br />may be awarded based on small differences in the scoring of many excellent applications. <br /> <br />In addition, most major sources of funding for housing operations and support services are time- <br />limited. There is the possibility, but not usually a guarantee, of renewal. Adding to the complexity, <br />many lenders will require that all of the necessary financing be in place before committing any <br />funds. To increase the complexity, funding applications are usually due and funds are awarded at <br />different times during the year. The competition for funding and intricacies of timing complicate a <br />usually complex process of local planning, zoning, and development reviews, approvals, and <br />permits. Not surprisingly given this level of complexity, the housing development process is both <br />labor-intensive and time~consuming. A development project can take anywhere from three to five <br />years (or more) to complete, during which time construction costs are likely to have increased. <br /> <br />Typical challenges faced in financing permanent supportive housing include: <br /> <br />· Limited rental income and limited ability to support debt. As a result, developers need to <br />access multiple sources to complete the financing for development and operating costs. <br /> <br />· Higher operating costs. Permanent supportive housing requires higher staffing levels to <br />support tenants' long-term housing stability and provide an appropriate level of property <br />management. <br /> <br />· Operating shortfalls that get larger over time. Rental income does not keep pace with rising <br />operating costs; that means on-going rental subsidies will be needed. <br /> <br />· Cost of services. Rental income is insufficient to cover the costs of providing support services. <br />Additional funding sources for services are needed. <br /> <br />· Short-term funding. Most funding, especially for services, is short-term; permanent supportive <br />housing needs mid- to long~term funding sources. For example, the use of low-income housing <br />tax credits requires a 55-year term of affordability, while services are usually funded for one to <br />three years at a time. <br />