My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8D Consent 2006 1218
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2006
>
Packet 2006 1218
>
8D Consent 2006 1218
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2007 11:33:28 AM
Creation date
12/14/2006 2:14:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
12/18/2006
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2006 1218
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2006\Packet 2006 1218
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Doolittle Entryway P&S <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />December 18, 2006 <br /> <br />The proposed resolutions will revise project funding. The funding plan previously approved is <br />insufficient to cover the project costs. Therefore, staff is requesting it be rescinded in favor of <br />the new plan outlined in the Fiscal Impact section. <br /> <br />Current City Council/Redevelopment Aeency Policy <br /> <br />. City-wide entryway statement <br />. Cooperation with neighboring cities at City boundaries <br /> <br />Previous City Council/Redevelopment Aeency Action(s) <br /> <br />. On January 16, 2001 by Resolution No. 2001-4, the City Council approved the design phase <br />MOU agreement with the City of Oakland and Port of Oakland <br />. On July 16, 2001 by Resolution No. 2001-116, the City Council approved a design <br />contractual services agreement with John Cahalan Landscape Architect <br />. On June 19, 2006 by Resolution Nos. 2006-075 and 2006-006 RDA, the City Council <br />approved the plans and specifications and called for bids <br />. On July 31, 2006 by Resolution No. 2006-098, the City Council rejected all bids for the <br />proj ect <br /> <br />City Council Committee Review and Action <br /> <br />. Presented to the Facilities Committee on August 1, 2002 <br /> <br />Applicable General Plan Policy <br /> <br />. Appearance and identity <br />. Economic vitality and opportunity <br /> <br />Permits and/or Variances Granted <br /> <br />. Caltrans Encroachment Permit is required <br /> <br />Environmental Review <br /> <br />. A Categorical Exemption was filed with Alameda County <br />. National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) has been filed <br /> <br />Code Compliance Review <br /> <br />. Building Department <br /> <br />Board/Commission Findines <br /> <br />Not Applicable <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.