My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8F Consent 2007 0220
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2007
>
Packet 2007 0220
>
8F Consent 2007 0220
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2019 9:17:14 AM
Creation date
2/22/2007 10:04:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
2/20/2007
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2007 0220
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2007\Packet 2007 0220
Reso 2007-014
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would <br />exceed the capacity of existing or planned <br />stormwater drainage systems or provide <br />substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? <br />(Drainage improvements where necessary to <br />control facility runoff will be implemented) <br />f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? <br />(None anticipated. Water quality certification <br />required) <br />g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard <br />area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard <br />Boundary or Flood Ins. Rate Map or other flood <br />hazard delineation map? (N/A) <br />h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area <br />structures which would impede or redirect flood <br />flows? (N/A) <br />i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk <br />of loss, injury or death involving flooding, <br />including flooding as a result of the failure of a <br />levee or dam? (N/A) <br />j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? <br />(There will be no habitable structures within <br />the project site) <br />IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the <br />project: <br />a) Physically divide an established community? <br />(N/A) <br />b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, <br />policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction <br />over the project (inc., but not limited to the <br />general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, <br />or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of <br />avoiding or mitigating an environ, <br />effect?(Conforms to local general plan and <br />zoning designations) <br />c) Conflict with any applicable habitat <br />conservation plan or natural community <br />conservation plan? (N/A) <br />X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: <br />a) Result in the loss of availability of a known <br />mineral resource that would be of value to the <br />region and the residents of the state?(N/A) <br />b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - <br />important mineral resource recovery site <br />delineated on a local general plan, specific plan <br />or other land use plan?(N/A) <br />Potentially Less Than Less Than No <br />Significant Significant with Significant Impact <br />Impact Mitigation Impact <br />Incorporation <br />X <br />I X <br />I I I X <br />X <br />I I X <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />I I i X <br />envchccl<.wpd-1 2/30/98 - t 0- <br />X <br />X <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.