Laserfiche WebLink
<br />are going to nearby airport (within 100 miles) they may be more likely to <br />request Runway 27R/L (VFR departures to Napa, Concord, Livermore, etc.). <br />The proposed database structure to be used in this analysis will include (but <br />not be limited to) the following fields: <br /> <br />Date and time <br />Airline <br />Flight number (if scheduled operator) <br />Registration Number (if not a scheduled operator) <br />Owner/operator <br />Aircraft type <br />Based or Itinerant Aircraft <br />Flow <br />Operation <br />Runway <br />Noise Level (SEL) at closest RMT [spell out RMT on first use] <br />Reason for noncompliance <br /> <br />In reviewing this database, efforts will be made to identify any trends or <br />correlations that may lead to additional analysis and a better understanding <br />of the non-compliant operations with the intent of developing programs or <br />procedures to achieve a higher level of compliance. <br /> <br />Task 2:Stage 1 and 2 Corporate Jet Activity <br /> <br />The study will identify and quantify the use of Stage 1 and 2 noise certified <br />corporatejet aircraft. The database will be reviewed to determine the <br />quantity of activity and aircraft type, to determine runway use and time of <br />day of flights, to identify the operators, and to determine if any trends exist. <br /> <br />Task 3:Lifeguard (Emergency / Air Ambulance) Jet Activity <br /> <br />The study will include an evaluation of lifeguard (air ambulance) emergency <br />corporatejet activity to identify and quantify the aircraft types on these <br />flights and any potential noncompliance with ATC rules governing the flights. <br /> <br />FINAL (12/08/06) <br /> <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />