Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Draft Excerpt February 22,2007 Planning Commission Meeting <br /> <br />Page 3 of4 <br /> <br />u.s. Mr. Adams said the company is looking for opportunities to grow its business in this area, and <br />bring additional jobs into San Leandro. <br /> <br />Matt Matthes, the company's planning consultant, talked about the plans and the zoning. Affiliated <br />with Sacramento-based Carter & Burgess, he presented drawings designed to show attempts to <br />color-coordinate the proposed buildings with Buildings A, B, and C in Bayside Business Park and <br />give an idea of the landscape coverage plans. As regards siting outdoor storage in the industrial <br />zone, he addressed the issue of view impacts on two fronts. First, no nearby buildings have <br />windows with a view of the property, so people will not see into the property from those buildings. <br />Secondly, the eight-foot wall around the yard would limit any pedestrian's seeing items stored in the <br />yard. Mr. Matthes also indicated that the plans meet City criteria and codes, and is generally <br />consistent with what the zoning. classification seeks - employment with good wages - and a good <br />specific fit for this piece of property, given what has already been developed in the area. <br /> <br />Commissioner Collier inquired about what would happen if the back area, with double-deck <br />containers, got full? She is concerned that they might be stacked four or five high, and be visible <br />from a long distance. <br /> <br />Mr. Adams replied that the goal is to rent the containers out; because they don't make any money <br />when they stay in the yard, most of the time they are out in the field. Also, the company has other <br />facilities in Northern California with which to exchange equipment and resources, so he does not <br />see that the San Leandro property will become a storage facility. <br /> <br />Secretary Pollart added that the containers would be confined to the area and height previously <br />indicated, and if they wanted to do anything differently, they would have to come back for a <br />modification. <br /> <br />Commissioner Collier restated the idea that there would be one row of double-stacked containers <br />on the eastern side, with no expansion without further approval. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Reed observed that San Leandro has become more and more sensitive to traffic issues, <br />and in that context, he finds an attractive feature of the proposal that National Construction <br />Rentals staggers shifts, which would have less impact on traffic rather than normal working <br />hours. He asked about the company's plans regarding truck traffic, wanting to confirm that it is <br />not in-and-out all day long. <br /> <br />Mr. Adams confirmed Vice Chair Reed's understanding. He said that typically all the trucks are <br />scheduled out to do approximately 8 to 10 hours of work during the business day. They go out in the <br />morning and return at the end of the day when the route is finished. While on the subject of traffic, <br />he also noted that the company does 99% of its business with phone orders or in outside sales, so <br />there is minimal customer traffic. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Reed expressed appreciation that National Construction Rentals' business model takes <br />into account the traffic impact. <br /> <br />Secretary Pollart added that when the subdivision went in, it was assumed that Lots D and E <br />would contain very large buildings. Environmental and traffic analysis reports at the time <br />anticipated much heavier use, and so from the traffic engineering standpoint, this project <br />generates much less traffic than originally planned. <br /> <br />Mr. Adams, referencing the traffic analysis, noted that some conditions pertain to payments by the <br />subdivider to the city. With National Construction Rentals as the buyer, rather than the subdivider, <br />he wanted to confirm that the conditions did not apply to the buyer. <br />