My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RDA Minutes 2000 0717
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
RDA Minutes 2000 0717
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2007 1:46:35 PM
Creation date
5/10/2007 1:46:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minutes
Document Date (6)
7/17/2000
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Minutes <br />San Leandro Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting - July 17,2000 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />B. Resolution of the San Leandro Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Leandro <br />Approving an Owner Participation Agreement (OP A) Between the San Leandro <br />Redevelopment Agency, Stan Boersma and Amin-Concord, LLC, for Construction <br />of a Hotel and Self-Storage Facility Located at 524-526 Lewelling Boulevard, <br />Assessor's Parcel Number 412-0011-001-07 (ensures the 121-room hotel and <br />137,000-square-foot self-storage project approved for construction by PD-99-2 <br />meets certain development and operational requirements and provides up to <br />$210,000 in tax-increment funds to pay for certain hotel project upgrades). <br /> <br />Jennifer Andersen gave the staff report, reviewing the project in greater detail and <br />explaining the rational for the Owner Participation Agreement. <br /> <br />Vice Mayor Glaze indicated his disappointment that this project is being brought <br />back to the Agency for proposed funding after the Agency had publicly stated <br />when it was before them the first time there was no Redevelopment participation in <br />the project. He commented that he feels this sets a bad precedent. <br /> <br />Agency discussion ensued regarding their disappointment in the proposed <br />Redevelopment funding. The Agency Members stated they didn't like the process <br />in which the Agency supported a project "in concept," without Redevelopment <br />Agency funding, and then had the issue come back to the Agency, with a different <br />looking project, with Redevelopment Agency funding proposed. <br /> <br />Council Member Loeffler commented that the City Council Economic <br />Development and Redevelopment Committee had discussed the project funding. It <br />was noted the proposed site is an underused site and that the proposed use will <br />improve the area. It was also noted that the Transit Occupancy Tax income will <br />make up for the costs, and the Agency will have a IS-year guarantee that it will be <br />a quality hotel. <br /> <br />The Mayor commented that the owner of the property had parceled out the <br />property, which resulted in one owner doing two projects. She sees this project as <br />a "win-win" for the City and stressed the importance of the IS-year guarantee of a <br />quality hotel on the site. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the need to amend the OP A to reflect language that <br />would provide for a potential extension beyond the IS-year guarantee for a quality <br />hotel. <br /> <br />Vice Mayor Glaze said he wants to make it clear to the City Manager that these <br />projects should not come to the Agency like this again. He feels staff needs to be <br />more up-front about possible Redevelopment Agency participation so that it is <br />clear to everyone involved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.