8F Consent 2007 0618 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Potentially Potentially Significant unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? D 0 D t8J b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or D 0 D t8J regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan D 0 D t8J or natural community conservation plan? DISCUSSION: Construction ofthe project would not physically divide any existing residential neighborhood. The project is in an undeveloped.area. The.project is being sponsored by the East Bay Regional Park District and the city of San Leandro. The construction of the bridge and connecting trail segment is one of the last links in the trail alignment called for in the Association of Bay Area Governments' Bay Trail Plan (ABAG, 1989) and is consistent with SB 100 (1987), which authorized the trail plan. The project is consistent with the East Bay Regional Park District Master Plan 1997 (EBRPD, 1996) and with applicable policies and development regulations contained in the San Leandro General Plan and Zoning Ordinance (see further discussion under Section XIV Recreation, below). Portions of the Preferred Trail Alternative are on lands under the iurisdiction ofthe Port, specifically portions ofthe northern edge of the trail. The other trail alternatives are all on lands under the iurisdiction of the City. There are no habitat conservation plans that have been adopted for the project area The project is within the jurisdiction of the Alameda County Airport Land Use Commission (see discussion under Section vn Hazards, above, and Section XI Noise, below). Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant unless Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability ofa known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents ofthe state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? o D, D t8J o o o t8J Y4204IS , 00693. doc - 4/5/07 -31-