My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8F Consent 2007 0618
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2007
>
Packet 2007 0618
>
8F Consent 2007 0618
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2007 10:11:37 AM
Creation date
6/15/2007 10:11:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
6/18/2007
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2007 0618
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2007\Packet 2007 0618
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />meters) east of the project site, the report measured an existing 2000 ambient (background) noise <br />level of 63.0 dBA CNEL, with a corresponding noise level for aircraft passing over the area of 58.8 <br />dBA. The report forecast a 2010 noise level at Site D due to aircraft overflights of 61.6 dBA. These <br />future noise projections are generally consistent with the noise levels forecast by the FAA and the <br />City General Plan, noted above, which range between 60 and 65 dBA. <br /> <br />The San Leandro General Plan sets exterior and interior noise compatibility standards for specific <br />types of land uses. For "outdoor sports and recreation, neighborhood parks and playgrounds" the <br />General Plan indicates that exterior noise levels up to 65 dB Ldn or CNEL are "normally <br />acceptable." Exterior noise levels for these uses between 65 and 80 dB are "conditionally <br />acceptable." . Based on the current and future aircraft noise levels identified in the 2003 DSEIR, users <br />of the project bridge and trail would not be subject to exterior noise above 65 dB DNL (or CNEL); <br />thus, noise impacts from the nearby airport are found to be less than significant. <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant unless <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br /> <br />XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would the <br />project: <br />a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, <br />either directly (for example, by proposing new homes <br />and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through <br />extension of roads or other infrastructure)? <br /> <br />b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, <br />necessitating the construction of replacement housing <br />elsewhere? <br /> <br />c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating <br />the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />DISCUSSION: <br /> <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />hnpact <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />No <br />Impact <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Construction of the project would not induce new population growth in the area, since no new <br />housing is proposed. The project would not require displacement of existing residences or <br />displacement of substantial numbers of people. <br /> <br />Y4204IS.00693.doc - 4/5/07 <br /> <br />-35- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.