RulesCommunications Highlights 2007 0705

Home

Rules and Communications Committee July 5,2007 Page 4 3. Update on Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) in Alameda County City Clerk Handa provided an update on the status ofIRV to date. She reported on the effect of the Secretary of State's voting system top-to-bottom review on IRV system certification, voter education and outreach, and the cost and timing of implementing the system. Chair Santos commented that he has been approached by a representative from the Secretary of State's Office to discuss IRV. Committee Member Starosciak commented on the February 2005 runoff election, in which she was a candidate. She stated that there were lots of problems with the all-mail ballot election. She commented that, even though there was only one race on the ballot and the City paid the return postage, voter turnout was only about 30%. Committee Member Starosciak read from a recent article in which the author provided arguments against IRV. She commented that she would like to see the City return to plurality elections, which she felt would save money, save time, and reduce voter confusion. Chair Santos noted that if a charter amendment to return to plurality elections was passed by the voters in 2008, it would not be effective until the 2010 election. Committee members discussed the pros and cons of runoff elections. Chair Santos stated that the City may need to engage the community to determine the support for majority vs. plurality elections. Staff will bring back an update on the progress ofIRV certification at the next meeting. 4. Public Comments Diana Gentry, Chamber of Commerce CEO, commented that the Chamber still supports the concept ofIRV. Charles Gilcrest commented on the 2000 charter amendment, stating that good government groups from San Francisco approached the Chamber, advocating both runoff elections and IRV. 5. Committee Member Comments None. 6. Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at 5:30 p.m.