Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Agenda No. 07-23 <br />December 13, 2007 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />RS-VP District. In order to protect the existing view corridor, the maximum <br />height of a solid fence, wall or hedge in the RS-VP district shall be no more than <br />three (3) feet above finished grade. The portion of a permitted fence between the <br />heights of three (3) feet to seven (7) feet shall be constructed with a transparent <br />material such as but not limited to, glass or welded wire or other transparent <br />material that allows for continued enjoyment of the view. Transparent materials <br />do not include chain link, mini-mesh, chicken wire, wood or lattice. Non- <br />transparent structural materials necessary for the support of the fence are <br />permitted every four (4) feet. <br />The views currently enjoyed by neighbors shall be respected. The proposed <br />construction shall not unreasonably block or diminish neighbors' views of distant <br />and scenic features, such as the San Francisco Bay and surrounding open spaces <br />and skylines, while balancing the applicant's ability to improve the subject <br />property in accordance with the applicable restrictions. <br />The Zoning Enforcement Official (ZEO) may modify the fence height standards <br />referenced subject to the approval of a Fence Modification Permit. <br />Commissioner Dlugosh pointed out that the term "finished grade" needs further <br />definition, because it is not clear. If I come into get a permit, my finished grade if I'm the <br />lower property would be at bottom of the hill, when the ordinance is actually trying to <br />maintain a view at the top of the grade. <br />Secretary Livermore explained that the ZEO considered the finished grade being that on <br />the property constructing the fence. <br />Commissioner Dlugosh agreed, but the property owner constructing the fence would be <br />the lower property, so language needs to address the point where limitations of blocking <br />the view would come into play. As he understands the term, he explained, the finished <br />grade of the lower property would not accomplish that purpose, because the property line <br />is at the bottom of the hill. It would be the finished grade on the adjacent, affected uphill <br />neighbor's property that should determine the fence location. <br />Secretary Livermore explained that her understanding from discussing the issue with <br />the ZEO is that the finished grade is where the two properties meet and where the fence is <br />being constructed. <br />Commissioner Dlugosh said that if that's the case, the ZEO is using a different reference <br />on the term "finished grade" than he is accustomed to. In Commissioner Dlugosh's <br />experience, finished grade is where the house is built after the property is graded. <br />Secretary Livermore said that the finished grade references the location of the fence, not <br />the home. <br />Commissioner Dlugosh pointed out that those differencing references in themselves are <br />reason for clearer language in the zoning code. <br />Commissioner Collier said that the Uniform Building Code specifies that any <br />construction regarding grade refers to highest point on the area of construction. <br />Commissioner Dlugosh said he is just concerned that terminology might set up <br />situations that might cause lawsuits to be filed, and wants it to be clearer up front. <br />