My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2008 0122
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
Packet 2008 0122
>
3A Public Hearing 2008 0122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2008 10:22:05 AM
Creation date
1/22/2008 10:22:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
1/22/2008
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2008 0122
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2008\Packet 2008 0122
MO 2008-004
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minute Orders\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Davidon Homes, July 2007 HortScience, Inc. <br />Tree Report, Woodside Apartments Page 6 <br />Potential impacts from construction were estimated for each tree. The most significant <br />impacts to the trees would occur as the result of reconfiguring the northern parking lot <br />and installation of a new retaining wall along the eastern property line. <br />A concerted effort has been mde by the developer and the design team to retain <br />redwoods between the proposed parking and the existing building. To provide a <br />minimum distance between the trees and the parking and to minimize the amount of <br />excavation required, concrete pavers will be used in place of asphalt and the parking <br />stalls will be palced as close to grade as possible (see attached Parking Lot <br />Reconstruction Exhibit, Milani & Associate, June, 2006). <br />Parking stalls will be very close to the existing trees and root loss will occur as a result of <br />the excavation and soil compaction. The following the Tree Preservation Guidelines <br />will increase the likelihood of survival, however the trees may show signs of decline as a <br />result of the proposed changes. <br />Based on our assessment, removal would be required for 22 trees (Table 3). Ten (10) of <br />the trees requiring removal were of poor suitability for preservation, 11 would be directly <br />impacted by the proposed improvements and one (1) is recommended for removal to <br />improve the health and condition of the adjacent redwoods (tree #339). <br />Coast redwoods at the Woodside Apartments were planted in close proximity to one <br />another and to the buildings. The trees have performed well at the site, creating a very <br />dense screen in front of the building, effectively blocking light and air movement to patios <br />and windows. Several trees have been repeatedly pruned away from the building to <br />maintain clearance. Removal of the three (3) coast redwood trees will have the benefit of <br />improving growing conditions for the remaining trees, as well as improving the livability of <br />the units by increasing light and air movement along the northern side of the building. <br />Eighteen (18) trees are outside the impacts of the parking lot renovation and can be <br />retained. Six (6) coast redwood trees may require puning to provide construction <br />clearance (337, 338, 340, 341,343 and 345). <br />Four (4) of the trees preliminarily identified for preservation are Sweet gums planted along <br />the western property line. These trees are growing in a narrow planting space between <br />the curb to the east and an existing retaining wall to the west. Surface rooting was noted <br />on all of the trees and they have caused displacemnt of the infrastructure in some places. <br />As this group of trees continues to grow, they will continue to conflict with adjacent <br />infrastructure. Although there is no impact from the proposed improvements, I consider it <br />an appropriate time to consider removing these trees (Table 4, following page). <br />Table 3. Trees recommended for removal. <br />Woodside Apartments, San Leandro <br />TREE SPECIES TRUNK IMPACT <br />No. DIAMETER <br /> <br />320 Sweet gum 12 Remove; poor suitability. <br />321 Sweet gum 16 Remove, within 3' of improvements. <br />322 Sweet gum 13 Remove, within retaining wall. <br />323 Sweet gum 10 Remove, within retaining wall. <br />(Continued, following page) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.