|
CITY OF SAN LEANDRO
<br />CITY COUNCIL SHORELINE -MARINA COMMITTEE
<br />June 10, 2008
<br />2:00 p.m. - 3:30 a.m.
<br />San Leandro City Hall
<br />835 East 14th Street
<br />San Leandro, California
<br />Sister Cities Gallery Room
<br />HIGHLIGHTS
<br />Committee Members: Mayor Santos, Councilmember Prola, Councilmember Starosciak
<br />City staff present: City Manager Jermanis, Assistant City Manager Hollister, Community
<br />Development Director Sims, Engineering Director Udemezue, Public
<br />Works Director Bakaldin, Business Development Manager Battenberg,
<br />Planning Manager Livermore, Planner Penaranda, Marina Supervisor
<br />Snodgrass, Community Relations Officer Ornelas, Public Information
<br />Officer McCrea
<br />Public present: Audrey Albers, Sondra Bass, Kevin Clarke, Mike Cook, Shannon Cornu,
<br />Raffi Demirjian, Elijah Esquibel, Tony Evans, Marlena Fontes, Nischit
<br />Hegde (Unite Here), Wei Ling Huber, Nicholas Javier, Bo Johansen,
<br />Doug Jones, Bob Leigh, Barry Luboviski (Building Trades) Gerd
<br />Marggraff, Linda Perry, Sabrina Porter, Martin Ricard (Daily Review),
<br />Andy Slivlea, Councilmember Souza, Charistel Ticong, Sabrina Torton,
<br />Obray Van Buren, Dan Walters
<br />The meeting was called to order at 2:00 P.M.
<br />1. Discussion of Ad Hoc Committee Recommendations Regarding Selection of Master
<br />Developer
<br />City Manager Jermanis provided a brief summary of the interview process for a master
<br />developer of the Shoreline-Marina Area. The process included creation of an Ad Hoc
<br />Committee, consisting of Councilmembers Prola and Starosciak. The Ad Hoc Committee,
<br />along with City Manager Jermanis, Assistant City Manager Hollister, and Business
<br />Development Manager Battenberg, interviewed two development teams.
<br />Manager Battenberg provided background on the Ad Hoc Committees process and reviewed
<br />the Ad Hoc Committee's report. She explained that of the five development teams
<br />interviewed, one, Madison Marquette, withdrew from consideration. Staff provided a detailed
<br />report to the Ad Hoc Committee including scores on the previously agreed upon evaluation
<br />criteria. The Ad Hoc Committee chose to interview two of the four development teams, Cal-
<br />
|