My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Finance Highlights 2008 0729
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Finance Highlights 2008 0729
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 10:13:54 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:13:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
7/29/2008
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2008 0902
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2008\Packet 2008 0902
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
competent service to the City. The key areas of difference are the level of customer <br />service and plan flexibility. <br />Cal PERS is clearly a large and well established organization but tends to offer a "one <br />size fits all" product. PARS, on the other hand is a smaller organization and promotes <br />customer service as one of its key advantages. In addition, with PARS, the City can <br />exercise some control over the operation of the plan. Consequently, given these factors, <br />staff would like additional time to review each provider and then take a final <br />recommendation, (selecting either Cal PERS or PARS) to Council (without returning to <br />the Finance Committee) in September of this year. Or, if the Committee wishes staff <br />could return to the Finance Committee in September with a final recommendation. <br />Transition to Pre-Funding OPEB Obligation <br />As noted above, Council has indicated that it wishes to pre-fund its OPEB obligation. <br />Pre-funding means that the annual contribution will go from a pay as you go amount to <br />an actuarially computed payment that funds both current costs and the unfunded portion. <br />Presently, the pay as you go contribution is approximately $900,000 and the pre-funding <br />contribution is approximately $1.4 million or $500,000 greater. This is a significant <br />difference and increasing the 2008-09 operating budget by this amount presents a <br />challenge. To mitigate the impact of such an increase, staff is recommending that <br />$500,000 of the set aside funds of $1.5 million be used to subsidize 2008-09 pre-payment <br />amount. Consequently, the $1.4 million actuarially determined ARC would be funded by <br />the operating budget, $900,000, which is currently budgeted, and $500,000 from the <br />funds set aside by Council in the Insurance Fund for the OPEB obligation. This would <br />leave $1 million in the insurance fund for Council's future consideration. <br />If the Committee supports the use of the "set aside" funds as recommended by staff, then <br />staff will bring forward the necessary resolutions to Council to authorize the use of funds <br />as approved by the Committee. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.