My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Finance Highlights 2008 0729
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Finance Highlights 2008 0729
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 10:13:54 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:13:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
7/29/2008
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2008 0902
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2008\Packet 2008 0902
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />Financial Position <br />The Condensed Balance Sheets for DSFRC reveal a steady improvement over the past <br />four years from what was an extremely precarious financial position. <br />In 2004, Net Assets were only $2bK and Unrestricted Net Assets were in a deficit of <br />($73K). Net Assets serve as a proxy for the financial strength of the organization and for <br />its ability to withstand a difficult financial period without cutting services, defaulting on <br />its obligations, or even having to close its doors. With a $7-8 Million dollar annual <br />budget and only $2bK in Net Assets, the Center was in an extremely tight position. The <br />deficit in Unrestricted Assets indicates that the Center had incurred liabilities in excess of <br />its unrestricted funds, and as a result there was no room for any discretionary spending - <br />existing obligations exceeded available resources. It would not be inaccurate to describe <br />this position as insolvent. <br />By 2007, Net Assets had increased to $31 OK of which $231K were unrestricted. This <br />indicates a return to solvency. As a supplemental indicator of this improvement, we have <br />provided the ratio of Unrestricted Assets to Total Assets, which has changed from -4.7% <br />to 15.3% over the four-year period. This quantifies the improvern~ent in the percentage of <br />assets that are self-financed and unrestricted. Although solvency is restored, however, <br />we are still concerned over the ratio of Net Assets to Annual Budget. This ratio reveals <br />the extent to which the net assets are being leveraged in the operation of the organization. <br />Stated simply, we believe an organization with an annual budget exceeding $9 Million <br />should have more than $310K in equity. In ordinary business terms, the Center is thinly <br />capitalized. Although the dangers of this capitalization are ameliorated by the Center's <br />ability to leverage minimal assets into a high relative volume through its government- <br />sponsored programs, we believe it is important that the organization address this risk with <br />a capital campaign to ensure that the organization can thrive over the long term. <br />Working Capital in 2004 showed a deficit of ($659K). Working capital represents the <br />excess (deficit) of current assets over current liabilities, and is a commonly used measure <br />of an organization's ability to pay its bills on time. The Working Capital Ratio was 0.493 <br />meaning that the Center had only enough Current Assets to pay approximately one-half <br />of its current liabilities. It would not be inaccurate to describe this position as illiquid. <br />By 2007, the Working Capital deficit was reduced to ($127K) and the Working Capital <br />Ratio was up to 0.879. There are many exceptions to this rule, but a working capital ratio <br />of 1.000 is generally considered the benchmark for liquidity. Although this position <br />indicates that there are still some liquidity problems remaining, it is a substantial <br />improvement over the four-year period. <br />The Defensive Interval Ratio is a ratio commonly used to evaluate liquidity in the <br />nonprofit sector. It is defined as Current Assets plus Marketable Securities divided by <br />Average Monthly Expenses. This ratio reflects how many months the organization could <br />5ustainability Study: Davis Street Family Resource Center - 4/08 Page 5 of 96 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.