My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Finance Highlights 2008 0917
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Finance Highlights 2008 0917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2019 10:14:42 AM
Creation date
10/17/2008 1:24:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
9/17/2008
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2008 1020
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2008\Packet 2008 1020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Consequently, if the voters approved a .25% increase from 8.75% to 9%, San Leandro could <br />collect approximately $5 million in additional tax revenue each year. As with the parcel tax, <br />this measure would have to go before the voters at a general election. <br />Revenue Option 4: Utility Users Tax <br />The City's Utility User Tax (UUT) has been in place for many years and provides revenue for <br />general operations in the City's General Fund. The City levies a 6% UUT on utilities that <br />provide electric, gas, telephone and cable TV services to San Leandro residents and businesses. <br />The UUT currently raises approximately $10 million annually. A 1% increase in the rate, (from <br />6% to 7%) would raise approximately $1.6 million in new revenue per year. <br />An increase in the UUT would have to be taken to the voters at a general election. The UUT is a <br />general tax and as such requires majority approval for adoption. <br />Benefit Assessment Districts <br />The next revenue category to be considered is benefit assessment districts (districts). In <br />California there are approximately 20 statutes that authorize local agencies to impose <br />assessments. There are several types of district including Special Assessment Districts," Mello <br />Roos" districts, maintenance assessment districts and benefit assessment districts. The common <br />characteristic is that assessments are levied on a defined geographic area and the funds so raised <br />must benefit that area. <br />A "benefit assessment" is any levy or charge upon real property to pay for public improvements <br />and/or services that specifically benefit that property. Benefit assessment districts are voted <br />upon by the property owners that are within the district. Property owners vote by ballot. Ballots <br />are weighted, meaning in proportion to the benefit that each property receives. Consequently, a <br />property owner that receives twice as much benefit as another property owner would pay twice <br />the assessment. In tum, that property owner would have their vote count twice as much. If the <br />votes cast determine that the weighted majority of the voting property owners do not vote against <br />the formation of the district, then the City is authorized to proceed. <br />Finally, property not individuals must be benefited. In practical terms, the City could consider <br />establishing Lighting and Landscape districts, a citywide park benefit assessment district or some <br />other combination to finance and provide services to specific areas of the City or the City as a <br />whole. <br />Revenue Option 5: 1972 Act Lighting and Landscape District <br />Districts formed under this act can pay for landscaping, lighting, maintenance and other public <br />improvements and services in defined areas. For example, several districts might be formed <br />within the City to pay for a variety of services such as median maintenance, lighting, or park <br />maintenance. If the City were to successfully form districts under this act, then maintenance <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.