Laserfiche WebLink
that in FY 2007-08, the Harbor Division had a shortfall of $874,000. The addition of required <br />capital costs to continue harbor operations (dredging and improvements) would amount to a <br />$3,388,000 annual shortfall. The harbor operations debt, as of June 30, 2008, was $6.9 million, <br />including General Fund and CalBoat Loans. <br />Councilmember Starosciak asked what the savings to the City would be if harbor operations <br />ceased. Manger Battenberg replied there would be approximately $1 million in savings, as the <br />$600,000 in GF and DBW debt service payments would continue. Interim City Manager <br />Hollister added that there would be an additional cost to decommission the harbor. <br />2. Discussion Regarding Dredging Alternatives including Results of Hydrology Study <br />Director Udemezue gave a powerpoint presentation reviewing dredging alternatives and results <br />of a hydrology study (see attached). He stated that if dredging ceased completely, the existing <br />harbor area would become mudflats similar to the area north of El Torito 14 to 16 years from <br />the date of the last dredge. He further reviewed information regarding the process of siltation. <br />His presentation additionally covered three options: <br />I. No Dredge -resulting in the closure of the Marina and the boat launch ramp. The City <br />would not incur any future dredging costs or capital costs, however, there would be <br />costs to dismantle the boat harbor. <br />II. Full Dredge -would include dredging of 310,000 cubic yards of material in 2009 and a <br />return to the four year dredge cycle. The estimated cost for dredging over the next 8 <br />years would be $15.2 million. An estimated $10 million in capital costs would also be <br />required. <br />III. Modified Dredge -would include a dredge to approximately 5 feet allowing small <br />boats to continue to use the boat launch ramp. The 2009 dredging would be managed <br />by the Army Corps of Engineers and the City would be responsible for disposing of the <br />approximately 85,000 cubic yards of material at an estimated cost of $2 million. Future <br />costs for a modified dredge to allow small boats access is estimated to be $2.2 - $3.7 <br />million every four years. Costs to dismantle the harbor would also be incurred as the <br />harbor in its current configuration would no longer be viable. <br />Based on the presentation, the Committee was in agreement that the modified dredge option <br />was optimal. Director Udemezue cited that the cost to dispose of dredge material depends <br />upon how far the material must be transported. It could range from $24 to $53 per cubic yard. <br />An alternative of pumping the slurry directly to Oyster Bay Regional Park was evaluated and <br />found to be more expensive than utilizing the Dredge Materials Maintenance Site and then <br />hauling the dry material by truck. <br />The Committee discussed the benefits of meeting with Federal and State politicians as soon as <br />possible to improve the possibility of the City obtaining any funding that may be available to <br />assist in the dredging. They also suggested staff negotiate along-term disposal agreement with <br />Oyster Bay Regional Park for 50,000 cubic yards of material every four years. <br />Recommendation: <br />The Committee recommended Director Udemezue's presentation be brought to the City <br />Council including a recommendation for City staff to work with the Army Corps of <br />Engineers on a modified dredge. <br />