My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2009 0302
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2009
>
Packet 2009 0302
>
3A Public Hearing 2009 0302
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2009 1:02:36 PM
Creation date
2/27/2009 1:02:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
3/2/2009
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2009 0302
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2009\Packet 2009 0302
MO 2009-011
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minute Orders\2009
Reso 2009-027
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to this resolution bears a reasonable relationship and is limited to the needs of the community for <br />elementary or high school facilities and is reasonably related and limited to the need for schools caused <br />by residential, commercial or industrial construction, and; e) the amount of fees to be paid pursuant to this <br />Resolution does not exceed the estimated reasonable costs of providing for the construction or <br />reconstruction of school facilities necessitated by the construction projects from which the fees are to be <br />collected. And be it further resolved, that the board adopts and levies the following fees upon any <br />construction within the boundaries of the District for the construction or reconstruction of school <br />facilities: A) $2.97 per square foot of all assessable residential space as defimed by Government Code <br />Section 65995(b)(1)." <br />The school district is limited by State law to a maximum fee of $2.97 per square foot feet of residential <br />development. The fees collected may be used for purchase or lease of interim school facilities, for <br />purchase of lease land for school facilities, for construction modernization and reconstruction of school <br />facilities, and for design, permit fees and school furniture. <br />[California State Assembly Bill 2926-School Facilities Act of 1986]. In 1986, AB2926 was enacted by <br />the State of California authorizing entities to levy statutory fees on new residential and commercial <br />development in order to pay for school facilities. AB 2926, entitled the "School Facilities Act of 1986", <br />was expanded and revised in 1987 through passage of AB 1600, which added section 660000 et seq. of the <br />Government Code. Under this statute, payment of statutory fees by developers would serve as total <br />CEQA mitigation to satisfy the impact of development on school facilities. <br />California Senate Bill 50 (SB 50). The passage of SB 50 in 1998 defined the Needs Analysis process in <br />Government Code Sections 65995.5 to 65998, thus providing the requirements that a school district must <br />articulate when identifying expansion programs. Under the provisions of SB 50, school districts may <br />collect fees to offset the costs associated with increasing school capacity as a result of development. The <br />fees- referred to as Level one fees-are assessed based upon the proposed square footage of residential, <br />commerciaUindustrial, and/or parking structure uses. Level Two fees require the developer to provide <br />one-half of the costs of accommodating students in new schools, while the state would provide the other <br />half. Level Three fees require the development to pay the full cost of accommodating the students in new <br />schools and would be implemented at the time the funds available from Proposition 1 A (approved by the <br />voters in 1998) are expended. School districts must demonstrate to the state their long-term facilities <br />needs and costs based on long-term population growth in order to qualify for this source of funding. <br />However, voter approval of Proposition 55 on March 2, 2004, precludes the imposition of the Level <br />Three fees for the foreseeable future. Therefore, once qualified, districts may impost only Level Two fees <br />as calculated according to SB 50. <br />The applicant will pay approximately $338,000.00 to the San Leandro School District pursuant to the <br />developer fee schedule developed by the District for Cannery Court. This will serve as the complete <br />mitigation of all school impact associated with this development. <br />General Plan <br />The City of San Leandro updated its General Plan in 2001. The San Leandro Crossings project conforms <br />to the city's General Plan pursuant to the following General Plan policies: <br />Policy 3.01 <br />MIX OF UNIT TYPES <br />Planning Commission Staff Report January 22, 2009 <br />San Leandro Crossings Public Hearing Page 7 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.