Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes -City of San Leandro City Council, Page 4 <br />San Leandro Economic Development Agency, San Leandro <br />Housing Finance Corporation, San Leandro Public Financing Authority, and <br />San Leandro Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting -June 21, 1999 <br />there is a 4% turnover in personnel but said there are a lot of employees that have <br />stayed with San Leandro. He expressed concerns with cutting youth programs. <br />He questioned if San Leandro is afamily-friendly city? He indicated the amount of <br />money spent on City Council compensation to oversee a budget of $108 million <br />dollars is $289,000. He voiced concerns with a library budget where there is a <br />40% reduction in the use of the library because of relocation, but he indicated he <br />does not see any reduction in the costs of personnel to staff that operation. He <br />stated, with respect to the City Hall retrofit, if he is reading it correctly, the City is <br />now paying $556,000 per year in interest on the retrofit. He concluded by stating <br />he is disappointed this is not a budget which clearly states the numbers to the <br />public regarding the costs. <br />Vice Mayor Galvan stated that, from what he heard from the City Manager's <br />presentation, the City Council Finance Committee could continue to review this <br />budget and make amendments, as they see fit. <br />Mayor Young noted there was also a comment from the City Manager regarding <br />potential Education Relief Augmentation Funds (ERAF); and, if the City does <br />receive those funds, it would increase the City's budget by enough that another <br />hard look at the cuts that were proposed could be reviewed for reintstatement. <br />Council Member Glaze stated he, too, has not been thrilled with this budget <br />process. He feels there is still a lot of work that needs to be done on this budget. <br />He indicated, for the public, the City Council is mandated by law to adopt a <br />balanced budget by July 1. He commented briefly on various funds proposed to be <br />cut and stressed that the City Council Finance Committee needs to continue to <br />review and prioritize the proposed reductions. He said there is a need to be <br />aggressive on where we try to get our funding. <br />Council Member Nardine echoed comments made by Council Member Glaze. She <br />stated the City Council Finance Committee should have answered a lot of the <br />questions. She feels priorities should be established for the proposed cuts so that, <br />when new money comes to the City, certain programs can be reinstated. She <br />voiced a major concern with the lack of reserves and indicated that issue should be <br />a priority. She said she does not have confidence the City Council Finance <br />Committee will be able to answer all these questions this year. She concluded by <br />stating youth have to leave town for activities; and, now, it appears we are pushing <br />seniors out, also. She stated she is nervous that the issues will not come back <br />before the City Council soon enough. <br />Council Member Grant indicated she sees the budget as a road map for where the <br />City wants to go. She added there is a need to come back and address the <br />priorities. She commented on the components she is reacting to, which include the <br />