Minutes 1999 0920 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Minutes -City of San Leandro City Council and Page 9 San Leandro Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting -September 20,1999 Council Member Glaze agreed with Council Member Nardine. He stated it was ill- advised to try doing all of these properties at one time. He questioned who's plan is being followed, who's vision, and where are we going with this vision? He feels the vision is getting skewed. He would like to see a plan for the areas in question before proceeding. Council Member Lothrop agreed with the need to come up with a plan for the future of this area. She expressed her disappointment in the lack of communication with the affected property owners in this community. She stressed that staff needs to find a better way to do this. Council Member Loeffler agreed with his colleagues. He indicated it is not clear what we're moving toward with this process. He indicated eminent domain is the most powerful tool and should be used as a last resort. He, too, feels the process is flawed and indicated the public has not been educated about the concept of redevelopment. He feels the City needs to pause and question why this process is in isolation of and is not being done in concert with the review of the General Plan. Vice Mayor Galvan indicated he has a great deal of respect for the process and realizes it is an emotional issue. He added, almost every development proposal in San Leandro, as abuilt-out community, is one that is a reuse of property. He further commented that redevelopment has been used to generate sales tax for the City. He credited staff for taking certain properties out of the proposed area, based upon concerns that have been expressed by particular property owners. He noted he has heard the City Council express great concerns in the past about specific areas (nodes) that are in need of upgrading. He stated he feels the City Council should move forward on some of the proposed areas (nodes); and he, as one Council Member, is prepared to do that this evening. Vice Mayor Galvan clarified with the City Attorney and for the record that his mother owns property on Washington Avenue; but he, personally, does not own any property within the affected area; and, thus, does not have a conflict of interest. Council Member Grant indicated she is not one who generally supports this type of taking of property. She also commended staff for their efforts on this proposal and indicated this has not been an easy process. She expressed that she feels many things are missing. She feels there should be more public knowledge about the process, as well as a shared vision. She would support holding this matter over and continuing it for further review but acknowledged she would like to see the Bayfair Mall node go forward tonight. She would also be in support of taking action on the Bal Theatre node but still feels there should be a plan. Council Member Lothrop indicated her support for moving forward with the Bal Theatre node, also. She would also see the Island Motel node as something that should be addressed tonight and, perhaps, also the preserve plant.