Laserfiche WebLink
.,, <br />Minutes - City of San Leandro City Council and Page - 15 - <br />San Leandro Redevelopment Agency Meeting - August 18, 1997 <br />it should never be lowered for any reason. This is not a civil service <br />job; it is an elected position. When someone runs for Mayor, they need <br />to know what the salary will be when they run. She said San Leandro's <br />history has shown that to serve as Mayor of San Leandro is a very <br />distinctive honor and all of San Leandro's Mayors, without exception, <br />have served with distinction and honor and have been the subject of <br />local, State, and national recognition. She believes our current Mayor <br />is as effective as those Mayors have been. She continued by stating she <br />is unequivocally in favor of removing the whole "incremental step" <br />policy. She would suggest the current Mayor be taken to the level of <br />salary which was in effect when Dave Karp passed away, which would put <br />her at close to the top step. She stated that the Council does not <br />elect the Mayor - the Mayor is elected by the people of San Leandro. If <br />the people of San Leandro don't think the Mayor is doing a good job, the <br />people can remove the Mayor. Her suggestion would be that the salary of <br />the Mayor be set at what it was when Dave Karp passed away and that, <br />hence forth, the salary never ever be lowered. Whoever runs for office <br />should always know what the salary is when they run. <br />Council Member Glaze agreed with Council Member Young, adding that he <br />feels this issue has come full circle. <br />Council Member Polvorosa asked when the Mayor actually submitted her <br />request. He also questioned if she submitted it in accordance with the <br />"step increase" process. He added that the people of San Leandro did <br />not elect the Mayor to be a full-time position; she has created that by <br />her own doing. He stated he does not feel she should be compensated in <br />that manner. He continued by commenting that the Policy Committee asked <br />for a "cooling-off" period, and now this is before the Council again. <br />He commented that he would like to listen to the tapes before voting on <br />anything. He was against the "step process" in the beginning, and he <br />feels the Mayor was already compensated adequately when the Council <br />acted on both the Mayor's and Council's salary in June. He concluded by <br />stating he cannot vote for an increase in the Mayor's salary at this <br />time. <br />Council Member Glaze noted the Mayor had responded to the guidelines as <br />set forth in the Policy. It was the Committee's decision not to base it <br />on the step percentage increase. He added that the tapes of the Policy <br />Committee Meetings have been available. He further stated that he is <br />tired of hearing the debate about whether the Mayor's position is full <br />time or part time. Given that the Mayor works approximately 70-80 hours <br />per week, perhaps the City should pay overtime. He concluded by stating <br />that he feels it is still part-time pay for a full-time job. <br />Vice Mayor Loeffler thanked the Policy Committee for their hard work. <br />He thanked Council Member Young for putting things in perspective. He <br />said he would like to see this issue put to rest. <br />