Minutes 1997 0818 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Minutes - City of San Leandro City Council and Page - 8 - San Leandro Redevelopment Agency Meeting - August 18, 1997 8. Redevelopment Agency Approves Disposition and Development Agreement. Resolution No. 97-20, Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Leandro Approving the Form of the Disposition and Development Agreement Between Creekside Center Associates and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Leandro. M/S/C Loeffler and Galvan. Ayes: 7; Noes: 0 Council Member Polvorosa congratulated Mr. Irmer for going the extra mile by involving the community in this project. He feels he did a great job on the proposal and that the design is wonderful. Vice Mayor Loeffler commented that redevelopment is no easy task in San Leandro and Mr. Irmer's patience and persistence worked. He extended his thanks on behalf of the citizens in District 5. A ten-minute break was announced at 8:18 a.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:25 p.m. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS Public Comments are limited to 5 minutes per person. The public is invited to make any comments related to Agenda items, or other items of public interest, at this time. A. Don Cook, 2155 Edgehill Ct., addressed the Council urging them to deny the appeal regarding the limousines parked at 1862 Edgehill Ct. He noted that the Council was very lenient when this matter first went through, but he feels very strongly that the limousines should not be on the street. Ingrid Gook, 2155 Edgehill Court, addressed the Council in opposition to commercial vehicles on her block. He noted concerns with visual impacts and access for fire response, adding that the limousines block the way for fire engines that may need to get through. She urged the Council to deny the Appeal. Joanne Griffen, 2027 Edgehill Court, addressed the Council, noting they welcome these new neighbors into their district, but stated her opposition to commercial vehicles on the street. Mr. Griffen, 2027 Edgehill Court, addressed the Council in opposition to the stretch limousines on his street. He noted the problem seems to be that there are two new limousines there now; but, if there is a good business, there would be more and more limousines. He added that he is speaking on behalf of at least 13 neighbors in opposition to this business and urged Council to deny the Appeal.