My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2005-020
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2005
>
Reso 2005-020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 2:58:51 PM
Creation date
7/29/2009 2:58:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
3/7/2005
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.u ENVIItONMENTAL C~IECKLIST <br />DISCUSSION <br />a,b) Pipeline would be installed within roadway right-of-ways using standard open-cut trenching <br />techniques by means of speed shoring or trench box bracing. Bore and jack methods would be <br />used under creeks. Table 1-2 summarizes the anticipated construction methods for each pipeline <br />segment. <br />Traffic-generating construction activities related to pipeline installation would consist of the daily <br />arrival and departure of construction workers to the work site; trucks hauling equipment and <br />materials to the work site; and the hauling of excavated spoils from, and import of new fill to, <br />each work site. An estimated 10 workers would be used for the pipeline construction crew. <br />Construction equipment used for pipeline construction would include backhoes, front-end <br />loaders, dump trucks, flatbed delivery trucks, cranes, compactors, concrete trucks, and paving <br />equipment. <br />Based on the estimated crew size, and assuming some overlap in construction activities at the <br />work site, construction worker trips traveling to and from the work site are not anticipated to <br />exceed 15 round trips (30 one-way trips) per day. <br />As discussed in Section 1.0, the trench size for open-cut installation within paved roadways <br />would be approximately four feet wide and six feet deep. The active work areas of about eight <br />feet on one side of the trench and 10 to 12 feet on the other side for access by tracks and loaders. <br />This would result in a construction easement of approximately 30 feet in width. It is expected <br />that open trench construction within paved roadways would proceed at the rate of approximately <br />200 feet per day, with an overall work zone of 300 to 600 feet. Using the above trench size and <br />construction rate estimates, and assuming full backfilling of soil, it is estimated that up to <br />178 cubic yards (cy) of trench spoils would be hauled offsite daily, and 165 cy of new fill would <br />be imported daily. Using an average haul load of 10 cy per truck, this would amount to up to <br />18 truck haul round trips (38 one-way trips) generated per work day. Accounting for the delivery <br />of pipes and other construction components (which would be shipped on demand to the Project <br />site throughout the construction period), the total number of off-site construction truck trips <br />would be approximately 34 round trips (68 one-way trips) per work day. <br />The pipeline alignments would follow within and/or across several roadways. The exact <br />placement of the pipeline in the roadways is not known at this time, but regardless of where it <br />would be installed, pipeline installation activities would temporarily disrupt existing <br />transportation, and circulation patterns in the vicinity. Impacts would include direct disruption of <br />traffic flows and street operations. Lane blockages during pipe installation would result in a <br />reduction in travel lanes, on-street and off-street parking. No constntction is pzoposed within <br />and/or across high traffic volume arterials. <br />Traffic analysis of the pipeline alignments found that the Project would not significantly affect <br />roadway segments and intersections at all locations if the construction zone were to reduce the <br />travel width during peak traffic periods. The impacts during peak traffic periods would not be <br />significant because they would result in either roadway or intersection levels of service (LOS) <br />that would not be unacceptable (i. e., worse than LOS D). The decrease in traffic volumes outside <br />the peak periods typically, but not universally, is sufficient to allow the reduced number of travel <br />lanes to accommodate the traffic flow without significant delays. Delays also would be <br />experienced by drivers during off-peak hours, but because of the lower volume, fewer people <br />would be affected by the delays during those periods. <br />San Leandro Recyclcd W ater Projcct 2.-44 ESA /?A3193 <br />Draft iS/MND <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.