My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2005-020
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2005
>
Reso 2005-020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 2:58:51 PM
Creation date
7/29/2009 2:58:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
3/7/2005
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.0 ENVIROMVIENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially With Less Than <br /> <br />Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Significant <br />rmoact Mitigation <br />Incorporation Significant No <br />Impact Impact <br />XV. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC -- <br />Would the project: <br />a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in <br /> relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of <br /> the street system (i.e., result in a substantial <br /> increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the <br /> volume-to-capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at <br /> intersections)? ^ ® ^ ^ <br />b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a <br /> level of service standard established by the county <br /> congestion management agency for designated <br /> roads or highways? ^ ^ ® ^ <br />c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including <br /> either an increase in traffic levels or a change in <br /> .location that results in substantial safety risks? ^ ^ ^ <br />d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design <br /> feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous <br /> intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm <br /> equipment)? ^ ® ^ ^ <br />e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ^ ® ^ ^ <br />f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ^ ® ^ ^ <br />g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs <br /> supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus <br /> turnouts, bicycle racks)? ^ ® ^ ^ <br />SETTING OVERVIEW <br />Pipeline installation activities would temporarily disrupt transportation and circulation patterns in the <br />vicinity of the Project. The Project would significantly affect roadway segments and intersections on all <br />pipeline segments if the construction zone were to reduce the travel width during peak traffic periods. <br />Potential conflicts could occur between construction traffic and bicyclists and pedestrians. Temporary <br />effects on the potential for accidents, emergency access, displacement of on-street parking, and <br />disruptions to transit service could also occur. No construction will take place in the immediate vicinity <br />of schools, hospitals, or day care centers. All traffic impacts would be mitigated to less-than-significant <br />with implementation of Measure T-1. <br />San Leandro Rccyckd Water Project 2-43 ESA / 203193 <br />Draft [S/tvIlHD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.