Reso 2005-020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EBMUD requests that the City provide a detailed description of the expected reduction in potable water demand for each proposed customer for the Project, As discussed earlier, EBMUD has an aggressive recycled water program in place to meet the future needs of its customers. Any projected savings in EBMUD potable water resulting from implementation of the proposed Project would help EBMUD meet its water recycling goal of 14 MGD by the year 2020. Discussion Monarch Bay Golf Complex irrigation is currently supplied by groundwater blended with potable water when salinity is too high. Additionally, the entire course is imgated (flushed} with potable water on occasion. The greens are irrigated with potable water. The golf course operators will try to use recycled water for the greens; the results will determine the extent to which demand for potable water is offset by recycled water. (For planning purposes, the City assumed that some reclaimed water [4 million gallons per year] would be used on greens.). For Phase lb, Marina Park, all potable water use will be replaced with recycled watex. Total potable water savings would equal approximately 35 million gallons per year. Issues Raised in California Fish and Game comment letter Comments on Environmental Filing Fee The Department of Fish and Game (DFG) has reviewed the document for the subject project. We do not have specific comments regarding the proposed project and its effects on biological resources. Please be advised this project may result in changes to fish and wildlife resources as described in the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 7S3.S(d)(1) (A)-(G) ~. Therefore, a de minimis determination is not appropriate, and an environmental filing fee as required under Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d) should be paid to the Alameda County Clerk on or before filing of the Notice of Determination for this project. Discussion City will pay the environmental filing fee to the Alameda County Clerk prior to filing the NOD. Letters Received After the Close of the Comment Period The following letters were received after the official public comment period ended, but are responded to nonetheless. Issues Raised in Kinder Morgan comment letter Comment on Petroleum Product Pipeline It appears that these facilities petroleum pipelines) will be within the construction zone of the proposed project. When project plans have been formulated, please forward a full sized set of preliminary construction drawings for our review and comments concerning pipeline protection when working near these facilities. z http://ccr.oal.ca.QOV/. Find California Code ofRegulatians, Title 14 Natural Resources, Division 1, Section 753