Laserfiche WebLink
City is not a "project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Res. <br />Code X21080. <br />E. In revising the Park Impact Fee set forth in this Resolution, the City Council is <br />exercising its powers under Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution. <br />F. The Record establishes: <br />1. That there is a reasonable relationship between the use of the Park Impact Fee <br />set forth in this Resolution (payment for certain park facilities) and the type of development projects <br />on which such fee is imposed in that all residential development in the City generates or contributes <br />to the need for the facilities described in the Report; and <br />2. That there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the facilities <br />described in the Report and the type of development prof ects on which the Park Impact Fee set forth <br />in this Resolution is imposed in that new residential development in the City will bring in more <br />residents, who are the primary users of park and recreational facilities; and <br />3. That there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the Park Impact <br />Fee set forth in this Resolution and the cost of the facilities described in the Report or that portion of <br />such facilities attributable to the development on which such fee is imposed in that such fee is <br />calc~ilated based on the total cost of acquiring and improving such facilities, the anticipated demand <br />for park facilities within the City based on the anticipated park facility service population in the City <br />and the percentage by which residential development within the City contributes to the need for such <br />facilities; and <br />4. The cost estimates set forth in the Report concerning the land acquisition and <br />improvement costs of the park facilities described in the Report are reasonable estimates, and the <br />fees expected to be generated by future residential development will not exceed the prof ected cost of <br />such park facilities; and <br />5. The method of allocation of the fee set forth in this Resolution to a particular <br />residential development bears a fair relationship, and is roughly proportional, to each residential <br />development's burden on, and benefits from, the park facilities to be funded by the such fee, in that <br />such fee is calculated based on the number of residents each particular residential development will <br />generate. <br />G. The Report constitutes a detailed analysis of how public services will be affected by <br />residential development in the City and the park facilities required to accommodate that <br />development, <br />ADOPTION OF FEE <br />NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Leandro does resolve as follows: <br />Definitions. <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2005-069 <br />