Laserfiche WebLink
San Leandro Marina <br />Boat Launching Facility <br />$184,000 Phase 1 Grant <br />(Total Grant Amount of $1,816,000) <br />SUMMARY <br />The City of San Leandro has applied to the <br />Department of Boating and Waterways for a <br />$1,816,000 grantto make improvements to the San <br />Leandro Marina Boat Launching Facility (BLF) on the <br />San Francisco Bay. This report concerns the Phase <br />I grant of $184,000. <br />The San Leandro Marina BLF is located along the <br />east side of the central San Francisco Bay, within the <br />City of San Leandro. <br />The Boating and Waterways Commission has not <br />previously consented to grants to the City of San Leandro at this location. <br />The existing boat launching facility, constructed in 1979-80 by the Department of Boating and <br />Waterways consists of an existing two-lane ramp, boarding floats, 57 vehicle/taller and 3 single <br />vehicle parking area, lights, a restroom, and miscellaneous site amenities. <br />The exisitng facility is in need of major renovation and does not meet present dayADAstandards. <br />The new facility contruction will replace the existing facility (the old facility will be demolished by <br />the city of San Leandro and developed commercially). <br />The proposed project entails the following: (1) demolition <br />and removal of existing pier and parking area to allow <br />construction of new boat launching ramp and parking <br />area, (2) construction of two-lane concrete boat <br />launching ramp, (3) installation of two concrete boarding <br />floats, (4) construction of 65 vehicle/trailer parking area, <br />(5) construction of a two unit restroom, (6) construcion of <br />maneuvering area, ready lane, and wash down area,(7) <br />construction of two concrete brows, (8) installation of four <br />concrete piles, (9) and utilities. <br />S <br /> <br /> <br /> . <br />~. <br /><. <br />The benefit/cost ratio must be greaterthan unity (1.00) before public investment in a project is <br />justified. This project is considered economically feasible with abenefit/cost ratio of 3.30. <br />