Laserfiche WebLink
POl 6.ATI U.LY <br /> POTSV"r1.41,LY SIG~PIC~~T LFSS"fll4A <br />iE5 <br />t551 SICAIhlC4Ar I~LF.SS SIGAIPICA\r SO~RCFS <br />_ ISSLES \1frICA~110A IA1 PACT ~~1PaC1 <br /> 1ACORPORA"I-ED <br />6. BIOLOGICAL. RESOLRCES. Would the ro'ect: <br />a. Have a substantial adverse effect. either X <br />directly or through habitat modifications; on 1, 7 <br />any species identified as a candidate, sensitive. <br />or special status species in local or regional <br />plans, policies, or regulations, or by the <br />California Department of Fish and Game or <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service'? <br />b. I~Iave a substantial adverse effect an any X <br />riparian habitat or other sensitive natural 1, 7 <br />community identified in local or regional <br />plans, policies, regulations or by the California <br />Department of Fish and Game ar US Fish and <br />Wildlife Service? <br />c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally X <br />protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 1, 7 <br />of the Clea^ Water Act (including, but not <br />limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc. j <br />through direct removal, filling; hydrological <br />interru lion. or other means'? <br />d. Interfere substantially with the movement of an X <br />resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or 1, 7 <br />with established native resident or migratory <br />wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native <br />wildlife nurse sites'? <br />e. Contlict with any local policies or ordinances X <br />protecting biological resources, such as a tree 4, 7 <br />reservation olicv or ordinance'? <br />f~. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted X <br />Habitat Conservation Plan. Natural 1, 4, 7 <br />Community Conservation Plan or other <br />approved local, regional, or state habitat <br />conservatio^ tan'? <br />EXPLANATION: <br />a-c) The open nature of the DMMS, the relative absence of human disturbance, and the seasonal and;or intermittent presence of <br />shallow water and wet mud, make the site attractive to shorebirds for loafing and feeding during high tide periods in the Bay. Bird <br />counts- have recorded numerous species of sandpipers, plovers, gulls, ducks and wading birds in the area, when standing water is <br />present. This project would return the Fast and West Basin of the site to a condition suitable as "managed mudflat" habitat Cor <br />shorebirds by increasing the frequency and duration of seasonal flooding and by providing low elevation "islands" Cor use by resting <br />birds. <br />The DMMS levees also provide potential nesting habitat for certain bird species, including killdeer and burrowing owl. The <br />burrowing owl is a California species of special concern and has been observed nesting in ground squirrel burrows on the site and <br />vicinity in the past. Preconstruction surveys as outlined in the Mitigation Program would be implemented to avoid any impacts to <br />land nesting birds. The outerslopes of the DMMS also provide potential refuge for the endangered salt marsh harvest mouse during <br />high tide and flood events in die adjacent marshlands. <br />The levees surrow~ding the DMMS provide habitat for California ground squirrels, although the levees are maintained to minimize <br />such use. Squirrel burrows if present, could also serve as nest for the burrowing owl (Speotvlocunicularia). Burrowing owl nesting <br />within the Roberts Landing area has been previously documented, although none are known to have nested on levees within the <br />DMMS in over 10 years. No construction equipment or activity would take place in sensitive wetland areas which are located near <br />the DMMS to the east and south. Therefore, no reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals <br />would be antici ated. <br />San Leandro Dredged Material Management Site 9 March / 2004 <br />Sediment Removal Project <br />