Laserfiche WebLink
PO'I F.ATIALLI <br /> ro~rr.x~nai.i.t sic~ricn~~r i.fas rnn~' <br />iSSCES su;vric:~x~ r~t,t-ss sic~n~icn~~r nit nrr sot acres <br /> iss~ ea ~nnc~~~wx~ nri~ac~r <br /> i~cokrorz,~~rr.n <br /> <br />I0. TRA~'SPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would t he rooect: <br />a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial X 4 <br />in relation to the existing traffic load and <br />capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a <br />substantial increase in either the number of <br />vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on <br />roads, or con estion at intersections)'? <br />b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a X 4 <br />level of service standard established by the <br />county congestion management agency for <br />desi =nested roads or hi >hwavs'? <br />c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, X 4 <br />Including either an increase in traffic levels or <br />a change in location that results in substantial <br />safety risks'? <br />d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design X =I <br />feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous <br />intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm <br />e~ ui ment)'? <br />e. Result in inade uate emereenc access'? X 4 <br />f. Result in inade uate arkin ca acit ~'? X 4 <br />g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or X 4 <br />Programs supporting alternative transportation <br />e. ., bus turnouts, bic cle racks '? <br />h. Trigger CMA Review? (GPA invoh~ing more X `~ <br />than 100 p.m. peak hour trips generated over <br />existin GP) <br />EXPLANATION: <br />The removal operation would temporarily disrupt transportation and circulation patterns in the vicinity of the Project. The traffic <br />analysis summarized below found that the Project would significantly affect roadway segments and intersections on all truck route <br />segments if the haul route were to introduce truck traffic to roadways where no truck traffic currently exists. Potential conflicts <br />along the haul route could occur between truck traffic and bicyclists and pedestrians. All traffic impacts would be mitigated to less- <br />than-significant levels by mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. <br />a,b) The City of San Leandro proposes to remove dredged material recently placed at Dredged Material Management Site (DMMS), <br />located near the western bayfront; and reuse the material at Oyster Bay Regional Shoreline Park. The removal operation would occur <br />for approximately 60 working days, and would be limited to weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. <br />Traffic-generating construction activities related to relocation of the dredging material would consist of the daily arrival and <br />departure of construction workers to the work site, and the hauling of excavated spoils from the DMMMS to Oyster Bay Regional <br />Shoreline Park. Construction equipment used for relocation would include backlroes. front-end loaders, and dump trucks. Roughly <br />30 construction workers would he expected to work at the project site during the construction period. It would be expected that each <br />construction worker would drive alone to the Project site, generating 30 round-trips (or 50 one-way trips) each day. <br />Based on grading and offYiaul scenarios, it is estimated that up to 1,500 cubic yards (CY) of dredged material would be hauled off- <br />site daily. Using an average haul load of I6 CY per truck, this would result in up to 93 loads or round trips (187 one-way trips] per <br />work day. The maximum number of hourly truck trips would be approximately 21 round trips (42 one-way [rips) given a 9-hour <br />hauling period per work day. <br />San Leandro Dredged Material Management Site 13 March / 2004 <br />Sediment Removal Project <br />