My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2004-069
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2004
>
Reso 2004-069
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2009 10:16:16 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 10:16:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
5/3/2004
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
POTSV~IlAl.1.Y <br /> POTSy"r1ALLti SIGvFICA,v"r LESS TIL~y <br />ISSGES SIGyIFICAyr L yLF-SS SIC;vIPfCAyT 1~7PACr SOLRCES <br /> 15SLES ~11TIGAlIOA' 1~1P9CT <br /> 1ACORPORATEp <br />9. NOISE. V1'ould the ro'ect result in: <br />a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise X I, `~~ ~> >> <br />levcls in excess of standards established in the <br />local general plan or noise ordinances, or <br />a livable standards of other a envies? <br />b. Exposure of persons to or generation of X 1, a, 7, 11 <br />excessive groundboi~ne vibration of <br />roundborne noise levels`? <br />e. A substantial permanent increase in X 1, 4, 7, 11 <br />ambient noise levels in the project vicinity <br />above levels existin without the ro~ecC? <br />d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in X 1, 4, 7 <br />ambient noise levels in the project vicinity <br />above levels existin without the ro~ect? <br />e. For a project located within an airport land use X ~ <br />plan, would the project expose people residing <br />or working in the project area to excessive <br />noise levels'? <br />f. For a project within the vicinity of a private ~ ~ <br />airstrip, would the project expose people <br />residing or working in the project area to <br />excessive noise levels? <br />EXPLANATION: <br />a,c,d) Due to the increase in truck traffic on the road network surrounding the project site, noise on these roadways (Monarch Bay <br />Drive, Fairway Drive, Marina Boulevard, Doolittle Drive, and Davis Street) would correspondingly increase. However, this effect <br />would not be significant given the time restrictions of truck activity which are part of the proposed project. <br />Ambient noise levels in the Roberts Landing area are generally affected most by railroad noise and aircraft overflights from the <br />Oakland international Airport, and currently are about 60-65 dBA, Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) {Oakland <br />International Airport -Airport Development Program Supplemental EIR, 2003). <br />Excavation activity at the DMMS would have little effect on most residents in the area due to the distance (greater than 300 feet) <br />between the equipment use and the nearest residences (receptors). There would, hov,~ever, be an increase in roadside noise levels <br />due to project-related truck traffic on haul roads that extend through residential areas. .About 21 trucks per hour would pass along <br />these roads due to this project. On Marina Boulevard and Fairway Drive, truck frequency would only be about 1 1 trucks per hour <br />due to these streets being designated one-way truck haul routes. Each truck that passes would temporarily increase noise levels to <br />between 80-~5 dBA within 50 feet. To the average person, this increase would be perceived to be about twice as loud as "normal" <br />(i.e. non-truck) traFFc. However, a substantial percentage of existing traffic on the proposed routes is comprised of trucks. <br />Normally, the increase in noise due to the increase in truck traffic on roads through residential areas would be a significant effect. <br />However, as part of the project, truck traffic would be from 8:00 a.m. l0 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. and would be temporary. <br />Thus, given that the increase in noise would occur during the less-sensitive time period (daytime) and the hauling activity is <br />expected to last only three months, the effect would not be significant. <br />b) Construction activities and truck transportation would also generate vibration. FIuman response to vibration varies with the <br />degree of vibration and the frequency or frequencies at which the vibrations occur. Generally, humans cannot perceive vibrations at <br />levels less than 1 x 10-2 inches per second (O.OI inches per second). A truck or bulldozer at a distance of 50 Feet away will typically <br />generate vibration slightly higher than this threshold and thus would be noticeable, but not unpleasant to humans and not potentially <br />damaging to buildings. Vibration attenuates rapidly with distance from the source and at 200 feet would be imperceptible. Most of <br />the homes and other buildings along the proposed haul routes are at least 150 feet distant from the center of the roadway. <br />e,f) The project does not involve the development of anoise-sensitive land use, and thus, would not expose people to excessive <br />aircraft noise. <br />San Leandro Dredged Material Management Site 12 March / 2004 <br />Sediment Removal Project <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.