Reso 2004-069 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PO"rE.AI~InLLI Pp'rEv"I~L~I LY SIGAFIG1A f LESS'I I1,1,v ~SSLES SIC;AIrICnSI~ UALESS 51GSIFICAA''r ~A71'.~CT SOLRCF,S ISSLES ~11TIGAlIOA I>IPACr IACORPORAT@U c) The proposed project would involve the transport of dredged materials. There would be no impact to air traffic patterns. d) The project would not change the configuration (alignment) of area roadways, and would not introduce types of vehicles that are not already traveling on area roads. However, additional truck traffic would increase the risk of accidents. Project-generated trucks on project area roadways would interact with other vehicles. Potential conflicts also could occur between construction traffic and bicyclists and pedestrians. Implementation of mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring Program would require the contractor to prepare a traffic control plan in accordance with professional engineering standards prior to commencement, including compliance with roadside safety protocols, so as to reduce the risk of accident. Specific requirements that may be included in the traffic control plan are identified under in the Mitigation Monitorin~~ Program. Thus, implementation of mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring Program would ensure temporary increases in the potential for accidents would be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. e) The proposed project would have temporary effects on traffic flow, particularly with routes within residential neighborhoods and along school routes. Additional truck traffic could result in delays for emergency vehicle access in the vicinity of the haul route. Implementation oCmitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring Program would require the contractor to establish methods for maintaining traffic flow in the Project vicinity and minimizing disruption to emergency vehicle access to land uses along the haul route. Specific requirements shat may be included in the traftic control plan are identified under in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. Implementation of mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring Program would ensure potential impacts associated with temporary effects on emergency access would be mitigated to ales-than-significant level. t) The proposed project would create parking demand during the excavation period. All demand for worker parking and equipment parking would be accommodated on-site. Therefore, there would be no impact to on-street parking along the haul route. g) The proposed project would have no lasting impact on demand for alternative transportation or nn alternativc transportation facilities. However, truck traffic could slow bus movements for Route 55 operated by the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District. Route 55, which provides service between Dutton Avenue and Doolittle Drive, operates from 6:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. on weekdays. The haul route runs in tandem with Route S5 along Doolittle Drive, Monarch Bay Drive. and Marina Boulevard. Implementation of mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring Program would require the construction contractor to establish methods for minimizing construction effects on transit service. Specific requirements that may be included in the traffic control plan are identified under the Mitigation Monitoring Program. Implementation of mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring Program would ensure potential impacts associated with temporary disruptions to transit sen~ice would be mitigated to a less than significant level. h) The proposed Project is not a development project that would result in an increase in traffic flow throughout the project vicinity and would therefore not trigger the need for a Congestion Management Agency review. San Leandro Dredged Material Ivlanagement Site 15 March 1 ?004 Sediment Removal Project