My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2004-069
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2004
>
Reso 2004-069
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2009 10:16:16 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 10:16:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
5/3/2004
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ISSUES <br />POTENTIALLY <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />ISSUES <br />POTf:NT'IALI.Y <br />SIGNFIGIN"r <br />UNLESS <br />MITIGATION <br />INCORPORATED <br />LESS THAN <br />NO 50LRCES <br />SIGNIFICANT IMPACT <br />IMPACT <br />lb. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. Would the ro ect: <br />X 1, 7 <br />a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or <br />Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), <br />as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the <br />Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of <br />the California Resources Agency, to non- <br />a rieultural use`? <br />X 1, 5, 7 <br />b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural <br />use, or a Williamson Act contract`? <br />X ~' ~ <br />c. Involve other changes in the existing <br />envirorunent which, due to their location or <br />nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, <br />to non-agricultural use`? <br />EXPLANATION: <br />a-c) The DMMS does not contain any agricultural crops. In addition, the site is not zoned for agricultural use and is not under a <br />Williamson Act contract. <br />17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. <br />a. Does the project have the potential to degrade X <br />the quality of the environment, substantially <br />reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, <br />cause a fish or wildlife population to drop <br />below self-sustaining levels, threaten to <br />eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce <br />the number or restrict the range of a rare or <br />endangered plant or animal or eliminate <br />important examples of the major periods of <br />California histo or rehisto ? <br />b. Does the project have impacts that are <br />individually limited, but cumulatively <br />considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" <br />means the incremental effects of a project that <br />are considerable when viewed in connection <br />with the effects of the past projects, the effects <br />of other current project,, and the effects of <br />robable future ro~ects.) <br />X <br />c. Does the project have environmental effects <br />which will cause substantial adverse effects on <br />human bein s, either direct] or indirect] ? <br />EXPLANATION: <br />The project may temporarily impact air quality, biotic resources, noise levels, recreation uses, and traffic. These impacts would be <br />mitigated, are temporary, and would not be considered substantial. The project is anticipated to have primarily short-term <br />c and noise) may be intensified because of cumulative <br />ff <br />t <br />d <br />i <br />ra <br />y (e.g. <br />construction-related impacts. Some of the impacts in this stu <br />effects, but none of the impacts detetrnined to be less than significant would be expected to be cumulatively significant. <br /> 17. SOURCE REFERENCES <br /> ] . Determination based on location of ro~ect <br /> 2. Determination based on staff office review <br /> 3. Determination based on Iield review <br /> 4, Determination based on San Leandro General Plan <br />San Leandro Dredged Material Management Site 19 March / 2004 <br />Sediment Removal Project <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.