Laserfiche WebLink
POTENTIALLY <br />ISSUES POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS THAN NO <br /> SIGNIFICANT UNLESS SIGNIFICANT InTPACT SOURCES <br /> ISSUES P7ITIGATION IATPACT <br /> <br />~ <br />-- INCORPORATED <br />f. For a project within the vicinity of a private <br />airstrip, would the project result in a safety X 6 <br />hazard for people residing or working in the <br />I-oject area? <br />g. Impair implementation of or physically <br />interfere with an adopted emergency response X 2 <br />lan or emer ency evacuation lan? <br />h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk <br />of loss, injury or death involving wildland X 1 <br />fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to <br />urbaluzed areas or where residences are <br />intenTUxed with wildlands? <br />Tr YPT ANATT(1N• A Phase T Fnvirnrn»ental Site Assessment (ESAI o f the site was comuleted by AEI Consultants In early April <br />2004 (a copy of report can be viewed at City Hall during normal business hours). One of the three significant findings of the ESA, '~ <br />ilvolving an underground storage tank (UST) has since been cleared. The ESA reported no record of a UST removal; a record of ~' <br />removal does exist and is on file at the City of San Leandro Envi-omnental Services Division. The ESA also reported that the site is <br />within the PCE groundwater plume associated with the former CatelPillar facility at 800 Davis Street. The City's Environmental <br />Services staff indicates that the conunercial uses proposed for this site do not trigger any action related to the Caterpillar plume, and <br />therefore impacts are less than significant. Finally, it is not known whether the existing building, which is proposed for substantial <br />renovation, contains any asbestos or lead contamination (in the form of paint), This is a potentially significant impact. The site plan <br />has been designed in consultation with Fire Deparnnent and Transportation staff to allow adequate access for emergency services. <br />The project site is not located within an airport land use plan nor is it in the vicinity of a private airstrip, or subject to wildland fires. <br />The folio«~ing mitigation measure is recomTnended in order to reduce potential impacts related to hazardous materials to a level of <br />insignificance: <br />• Any lead and/or asbestos-containing materials that may be onsite shall be properly managed and disposed during <br />construction activities. Prior to issuance of grading pernTits, plans for removal and disposal of lead and asbestos- <br />contaiuing materials (if found to be onsite) shall be reviewed and approved by the Chief Building Official and <br />Environmental Services staff. <br />9. NOISE. Would the ro'ect result in: <br />a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise <br />levels in excess of standards established in the X 2 <br />local general plan or noise ordinances, or <br />a licable standards of other a encies? <br />b. Exposure of persons to or generation of <br />excessive groundborne vibration of X 2 <br />oundborne noise levels? <br />c. A substantial permanent increase in <br />ambient noise levels ii the project viciuty X 2 <br />above levels existing without the project? ___ _ <br />d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in <br />ambient noise levels in the project viciuty X 2 <br />above levels existin without the ro'ect? <br />e. For a project located v~~ithin an airport land use <br />plan. would the project expose people residu-Ig X 1, 2, 6 <br />or workirrg in the project area to excessive <br />noise levels? <br />f. For a project withir the vicirity of a private <br />airstrip, would the project expose people X 1, 2, 6 <br />residing or working in the project area to <br />excessive noise levels? <br />1016-1052 Davis/ PLN2004-00031 -Initial Study Checklist 8 Apri12004 <br />