Laserfiche WebLink
DIRECT ACCESS CREDIT <br />The Direct Access Credit results from the intersection of CPUC regulations and <br />extraordinarily high prices for electricity in 2000. The following is excerpted from a CPUC <br />draft document that describes what the Direct Access Credit is and how it is derived.2 <br />°Since 1998, PG&E and SCE have offered service to two distinct classes of customers. <br />Bundled service customers received the full range of electric services from the utilities, <br />which include energy procurement and delivery. PG&E and SCE customers could also <br />choose, under the DA option, to purchase energy from an electric service provider <br />(ESP). PG&E and 5CE continue to deliver electricity to both [Direct Access] and <br />bundled service customers. <br />A. Rate Freeze <br />Total rates were frozen at levels in effect on June 10, 1996 for all customers. Bundled <br />service customers paid these frozen rates for the duration of the transition period <br />(January 1, 1998 through March 31, 2002 or aCommission-authorized earlier end <br />date). These frozen tariff rates included a generation rate component. The generation <br />rate was unbundled into a market price and a competition transition charge (CTC) <br />component. The CTC was calculated residually as the difference between the fixed <br />generation rate component and the market price, where the market price was based <br />on the utility's cost of procuring power from the PX and the California Independent <br />System Operator (ISO). All customers pay the CTC and the CTC revenues were to be <br />used to pay for the utility's stranded generation costs, also known as transition costs. <br />B. The Avoided Cost Credit <br />The utilities calculated a market price for billing purposes utilizing the cost and <br />quantities of power purchased from the PX. This PX price was used to determine the <br />contribution to the recovery of CTC (when compared to the generation rate component <br />of frozen rates) and also represented the utilities' avoided cost of procuring energy. <br />The PX component of the generation rate was either applied to recover the cost of <br />purchasing power for bundled service customers or given as a credit to DA customers. <br />The credit reflected the fact that DA customers had chosen to procure their energy <br />through an ESP rather than the utility. So long as the market price, or DA credit, <br />remained below the generation component of the customer's frozen rate, the DA <br />customer continued to make a contribution to CTC in exactly the same manner as a <br />similarly situated bundled service customer. <br />C. The Zero Minimum Bill Provision <br />Because the DA credit was based on the market price from the PX, it was possible that <br />the credit would exceed either the generation rate component or the entire bill. If the <br />PX credit exceeded the generation rate component, there was a negative CTC, i.e., no <br />contribution to recovery of stranded costs. If the PX credit exceeded the entire <br />amount of the bill, meaning that the PX credit was greater than the sum of the <br />generation, distribution, transmission, public purpose, and the other rate components, <br />there would be a negative bill. In other words, the DA customer would receive a credit <br />for the entire utility bill. This is also known as a "credit" bill. <br />Z See Attachment D description of 1998 RAP -Draft Decision. <br />Wind Up Agreement-Attmt 13- v18 4-28-04 cln <br />