My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2003-007
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2003
>
Reso 2003-007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2009 1:58:59 PM
Creation date
8/13/2009 2:24:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
1/21/2003
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IMPACT <br />WILL-THE PROJECT: <br />Potentially Less Than <br />Significant <br />Less Than <br /> Cumulative Significant <br />Impact With <br />Mitigation Significant <br />Impact No <br />.Impact SOUrCe <br /> Incorporation <br />XV. Transportation, continued <br />b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, ~ ~ ~ ® ~ 11,12, <br />a level of service standard established by 26 <br />the county congestion management <br />agency for designated roads or highways? <br />c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, ~ ~ ~ ~ ® 11,12, <br />including either an increase in traffic levels 2g <br />or a change in locatior) that results in <br />substantial safety risks? <br />d) Substantially increase hazards due to a ~ ~ ~ ~ ® 11,12, <br />design feature (e.g., sharp curves or 26 <br />dangerous intersections) or incompatible <br />uses (e.g., farm equipment)? <br />e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ~ ~ ~ ~ ® 11,12, <br /> 26 <br />f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ~ ~ ~ ® ~ 2, 11, <br /> 12, 26 <br />g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or ~ ~ ~ ® ~ 11, 12, <br />programs supporting alternative 26 <br />transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle <br />racks)? <br />Discussion: <br />XV(a): Policies in the Housing Element strongly support the construction of additional housing in San Leandro. Such housing <br />would generate vehicle trips and would add traffic to local roadways. As noted earlier, the Element would not increase the <br />development capacity of the City nor would it result in traffic projections which exceed those prepared by the Valley <br />Transportafion Authority (VTA). No Land Use Plan or density changes would occur as a result of the Element's adoption. <br />VTA guidelines require a traffic study to be prepared for any project that would generate more than 100 peak hour trips. <br />Mitigation for traffic impacts would be determined on a case by case basis as future projects were proposed. <br />The Element recommends improving access to the Union Pacific railyard property in order to facilitate that site's development <br />with housing. If a new road or railroad crossing is constructed, traffic patterns on perimeter roadways could be affected. Any <br />road construction would be subject to subsequent environmental review and traffic studies. The potential for impacts would be <br />assessed at that time, and mitigation measures would be prescribed as needed. <br />Initial Study* San Leandro Housing Element Update* Page 23 November 12, 2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.