Laserfiche WebLink
f; 04 5AN-1.E41�. <br />City of San Leandro <br />Quarterly Perforniance Report <br />EXECUTIVE SUMNIARY <br />GENERAL OVERVIEW AND ECONOMIC OUTLOOK <br />Ending March 31, 2006 <br />AlthouLh Better Than Anticipated, Still Deficit Spending ... <br />• Year-to-date General Fund operations end the quarter utilizing $2.5 million of available reserves. <br />However, the City projects a reduced year-end operating shortfall of approximately $1.3 million as <br />opposed to the $3 million estimated about a year ago. <br />• The City received $1.38 million from 2003-04 vehicle license fee money borrowed by the State, <br />which was repaid a year in advance and will be used to offset the current operating deficit. <br />• Additional sales tax of 1.3% is anticipated by year-end and will assist with restoring the City back to <br />the level of sales tax revenue experienced during the 2000-01 fiscal year. <br />• The County's Office of the Assessor reported that recorded property assessed valuations have <br />increased 6.9% from 2004-05 to 2005-06, slightly better than the City's conservative growth <br />projection of 5.5% but below the 9.2% Alameda County growth rate. <br />• The local economy continues to show improvement but at a rate that still lags behind the rest of the <br />economy. The 2005 Bay Area annual average CPI of 2.9% is lower than both the national index of <br />3.4% and the Los Angeles regional index of 4.5%. <br />• LAIF's investment yield as of March 31, 2006 is at 4.03% as compared to 2.38% a year ago. The <br />City invests approximately 34% of its idle cash in LAIF and 66% with Chandler Asset Management. <br />Forecast Crystal But Not Clear ... <br />• City has proposed a June 2006 ballot measure to increase the current business license tax rates, <br />which is anticipated to generate an additional $2 million in annual revenue. <br />• The City's proposal to collect a franchise fee on Oro Loma recycling & disposal services is projected <br />to generate $500k in new revenues annually. <br />The amount of the City's ongoing structural shortfall will be impacted by the following: ongoing <br />revenue growth compared to the increase of ongoing expenditures, outcome of the business license <br />tax ballot measure and current employee negotiation processes, postponed maintenance <br />needs/ongoing deferrals that have reached necessary replacement status, and the success of future <br />proposed revenue enhancements. <br />• As a result of Proposition IA, which provides additional safeguards to City revenues from State <br />take -away, the City is obligated to make its final $1.2 million property tax revenue contribution to <br />the State this fiscal year. <br />