My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Finance Highlights 2006 1206
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Finance Highlights 2006 1206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 1:27:47 PM
Creation date
11/19/2009 1:27:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
12/6/2006
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2006 1218
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2006\Packet 2006 1218
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~'- 'John Jermanis <br />January 8, 2004 <br />The cost of implementation for the Port of Oakland can be seen in part through a July 2003 study <br />titled "Living Wage Implementation at the Port of Oakland, One Year Status Report" that was <br />completed by the East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy. The report indicates that the <br />Port of Oakland, in order to effectively monitor and implement the living wage law, created a <br />full-time "Sustainable Wage Specialist" position in May 2003. The Sustainable Wage Specialist <br />position is responsible for monitoring and enforcing the living wage law and prevailing wage <br />regulations. Enforcement in the first year was done through a framework created by the Port that <br />included aself-evaluation checklist, living wage compliance checklists, self-certification <br />statement forms, and notice programs for tenants at the airport. Although these tools are in <br />place, the Port has experienced serious gaps in the monitoring of firms. The database of covered <br />businesses is substantially incomplete due in part to the non-cooperation of some covered <br />businesses. The report recommended that the Port begin to complete proactive measures to gain <br />further compliance with the living wage law, including site visits and employee interviews. <br />The recent adoption of a living wage law in Sacramento helps to illustrate the potential <br />administrative cost of this legislation. In December 2003, Sacramento passed a living wage law <br />that will require a minimum wage for 2004 of $9.00 per hour for employees with health benefits <br />and $10.50 per hour for employees without health benefits. Furthermore, the wage floor will rise <br />by $.SO per hour in both 2005 and 2006. The ordinance will apply to companies with 2S or more <br />full-time employees on contracts worth a minimum of $100,000. Nonprofit companies with <br />100 or fewer employees are exempt. The ordinance also exempts professional service contracts, <br />Emergency service providers, and student internships. It applies to all full-time City employees <br />but exempts seasonal municipal workers. City special project manager Michael Medema <br />estimated that the cost for administration will be approximately $100,000 per year. <br />Finally, an unknown administrative cost to jurisdictions with living wage laws are the potential <br />legal costs incurred defending or enforcing the ordinance. For example, the City of Hayward in <br />November 2003 stepped in as a party to aclass-action lawsuit against Cintas Corporation in <br />order to defend the constitutionality of Hayward's living wage law. The costs for the City of <br />Hayward to participate in this lawsuit are unknown. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.