My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3B Public Hearing 2010 0119
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
Packet 2010 0119
>
3B Public Hearing 2010 0119
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2010 9:53:31 AM
Creation date
1/14/2010 9:52:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
1/19/2010
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2010 0119
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2010\Packet 2010 0119
3B Public Hearing 2010 0119 Attachment
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2010\Packet 2010 0119
Reso 2010-003
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2010
Reso 2010-004
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact Potentially <br />Significant <br />Unless <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br /> <br />Less than <br />Sign cant <br />Impact <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />o Impact <br />c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site <br />and its surroundings? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements. . <br />d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely <br />affect day or nighttime views in the area? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that will adversely affect day or <br />nighttime views in the area. <br />AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to <br />agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead <br />agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation <br />and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California <br />Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in <br />assessing impacts an agriculture and farmland. Would the project: <br />a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide <br />Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the <br />Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources <br />Agency, to non-agricultural use? <br />Comment: There is no designated farmland in San Leandro. <br />b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act ~ ~ ~ r_7f <br />lJ <br />contract? <br />Comment: There is no land within San Leandro that is subject to a <br />Williamson Act contract. Furthermore, the proposed ordinances will not <br />conflict with the Open Space/Agricultural Land Density regulations <br />because the proposed ordinances will not result in any new construction or <br />physical improvements <br />c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which due to their <br />location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- <br />agricultural use? <br />Comment: There is no designated farmland in San Leandro. <br />III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria <br />established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution <br />control district maybe relied upon to make the following <br />determinations. Would the project: <br />a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any air quality <br />impacts. The Discount superstore ordinances will reduce air impacts by <br />not allowing regional shopping facilities. <br />b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or <br />projected air quality violation? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any air quality <br />impacts. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.