Laserfiche WebLink
Potentially <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Unless Less than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact <br />e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of <br />existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial <br />additional sources of polluted runoff? <br />Comment: On-site and local drainage systems will be designed to <br />accommodate the additional stormwater runoff. <br />f. Otherv/ise substantially degrade water quality? ~ ~ ~ Q <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological <br />or water quality impacts. The landscape ordinances will reduce overall <br />water consumption in the city. <br />g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal ~ ~ ~ Q <br />Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood <br />hazard delineation map? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological <br />or water quality impacts. <br />h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede <br />or redirect flood flows? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological <br />or water quality impacts. <br />i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death ~ ~ ~ ~' <br />involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or <br />dam? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological <br />or water quality impacts. <br />j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any hydrological <br />or water quality impacts. <br />IX. LAND USE PLANNING. Would the project: <br />a. Physically divide an established community? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could physically divide an <br />established community. ~ ~ ~ Q <br />b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an ~ ~ ~ Q <br />agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the <br />general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinances) <br />adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements and will not conflict with any land <br />use plan, policy, or regulation that was adopted for the purpose of avoiding <br />or mitigating an environmental effect. The new ordinances will reduce <br />overall water use in the city and also reduce overall vehicle miles traveled <br />by prohibiting large superstores that serve the entire region and not just <br />the City of San Leandro. <br />c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community ~ ~ ~ Q <br />conservation plan? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements and will not conflict with any habitat <br />conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. <br />