My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2010-003
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2010
>
Reso 2010-003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 9:17:43 AM
Creation date
1/26/2010 9:17:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
1/19/2010
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
3B Public Hearing 2010 0119
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2010\Packet 2010 0119
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Potentially <br /> Sign cant <br /> Potentially Unless Less than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact <br />X. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: <br />a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be ~ ~ ~ Q <br />of value to the region and the residents of the state? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any impacts to <br />mineral resources. <br />b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource <br />recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land <br />use plan? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any impacts to <br />mineral resources. <br />XI. NOISE. Would the project result in: <br />a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of <br />standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinances, or <br />applicable standards of other agencies <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any noise <br />impacts. <br />b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration <br />or groundborne noise levels? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any noise <br />impacts. <br />c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project ~ ~ ~ Q <br />vicinity above levels existing without the project? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any noise <br />impacts. <br />d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the <br />project vicinity above levels existing without the project? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any noise <br />impacts. <br />e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan <br />has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use <br />airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project <br />area to excessive noise levels? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that would be subject to airport <br />noise. <br />f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project ~ ~ ~ Q <br />expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise <br />levels? (n/a) <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that would be subject to airport <br />noise. <br />Xil. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.