My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CitySLUSD Liaison Highlights 2010 0121
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
City & SLUSD Liaison Committee
>
CitySLUSD Liaison Highlights 2010 0121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2010 2:57:53 PM
Creation date
2/10/2010 2:57:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
2/21/2010
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2010 0216
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2010\Packet 2010 0216
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Governor's Proposals for the 2010-11 State Budget and K-12 Education <br />Budget Year Adjustments -Revenue Limit COLA <br />~ 2009.10 fiscal year- no furthercuts proposed <br />i 2010.11 fiscal year - "fullyfunded"COLA; however, the COLA is •0.38% <br />• This is looking like another unusual year for calculations <br />The funded rates for 2010.11: <br /> <br />District Type 2010.11 Statutory COLA <br /><0.38%> <br />All Elementary Districts <523> <br />All High School Districts <528> <br />All Unified Districts <524> <br />Routine Restricted Maintenance Account (RRMA) <br />Ir Prior to flexibility in the Budget, LEAs in the Senate Bill 50 SFP were <br />required to set aside 3% of total general fund expenditures for the Routine <br />Restricted Maintenance Account (RRMA) <br />~ These requirements were suspended beginning with the 2008.09 fiscal year <br />and continues through 2012.13 <br />Although LEAs do not have the requirement to make the RRMA <br />contribution, there still is the legal obligation to keep facilities in good <br />repair <br />+i LEAs may not be able to fully exercise this Flexibility because the <br />majority of expenses in RRMA are for classified salaries and <br />benefits <br /> <br />Administrative Cuts and Efficiencies <br />~ The Governor proposes cutting a total of 51.5 billion targeted as <br />"noninstructional," oradministrative costs at school districts and COEs <br />w 51.2 billion ongoing reduction to revenue limit funded targeted at school <br />district central administration and 5300 million attributable to <br />eliminating barriers related to contracting out for services <br />. This would apply to all districts, regardless of the current level of <br />administrative spending or cuts made prior to 2010.11 <br />• Monitoring would occur through review of reported Standardized <br />Account Code Structure (SACS) data <br />w The Govemor has yet to share the specifics of the proposal, but if <br />the cut were to apply based on current revenue limit rates per ADA, <br />it would be as follows: <br />Elementary High School Unified <br />5191 5231 5201 <br />Principal Apportionment Schedule <br /> <br />Month E.C. flONla)I2i, 13), <br />and (OI~SBX116 2010.11 Proposed <br />Apportlonment Schedule <br />Adjusted for Ddemals 3010.71 Apportionment <br />Schedule-SSC Plannirry <br />Rezemmendaeon <br />July 5.00% 5.0074 5.00% <br />Aupuri 5.00% 5.0075 5.0075 <br />September 9.00% 8.00% 9.00% <br />October 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% <br />November 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% <br />Dezember 9.00% 9.00% 9.007: <br />January 9.0095 9.0075 9.0075 <br />February 9.00% 0.5075 0.50% <br />March 9.0075 9.00% 9.00% <br />Apol 9.0075 B.OOX 6.00% <br />Mry 9.0075 9.00% 4.50% <br />June 8.00% 0.00% 0.00% <br />July 17.50% 17.50% <br />Aupuri 7.50% <br />Total Principal <br />Nonment f00.00N. 100.00% 100.00% <br />- ©2010 School Services of California, Inc. - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.