Laserfiche WebLink
EXPLANATION: <br />a) Adoption of the Housing Element would not result in any transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Additional <br />housing in San Leandro would probably lead to increased volumes of household hazardous wastes, but these increases <br />have already been accounted for in the General Plan EIR and the TOD Strategy EIR. Policies have already been <br />integrated into the General Plan to address potential impacts. Policy 34.06 promotes public education about safe <br />disposal of hazardous waste and Action 34.06-A calls for publicity of household hazardous waste collection events and <br />the location and hours of hazardous waste collection facilities. Because the Housing Element is focused on residential <br />uses, there would be no impact associated with industrial or commercial sources of hazardous waste generation. <br />b) The Housing Element would not result in any increased risk of upset or accident conditions involving the release of <br />hazardous materials into the environment. Some of the housing sites may contain older structures that would be <br />demolished, creating the potential for asbestos, lead, mercury, and PCB releases. This potential was already analyzed <br />in the General Plan EIR and is addressed through policies in the Plan. Policy 34.07 in the General Plan indicates that <br />the City will "ensure the safe and proper handling of hazardous building materials", and further notes that any such <br />materials must be handled and disposed in a manner that protects human health and the environment. The Housing <br />Element does not propose development in areas that were not previously assessed for this hazard in the General Plan. <br />Furthermore, any subsequent development project on the housing sites identified in the Element would be subject to <br />environmental review. This would include hazardous materials release risk assessments, along with a requirement to <br />comply with all applicable federal, state, and local hazardous materials regulations. <br />c) The proposed Housing Element would not cause the emission of hazardous materials or require the handling of <br />hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of a school. Future construction on any of the housing sites would require <br />clearance from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District regarding the presence of any potentially hazardous <br />materials that could be emitted during demolition or site grading. <br />d) Some of the housing opportunity sites identified in the proposed Housing Element were previously used (or are <br />currently used) for commercial purposes. The housing sites include gas stations, car sales lots, car rental lots, auto <br />repair businesses, and a furniture warehouse. In some cases, past activities may have introduced contaminants that will <br />require clean-up before the site may be safely redeveloped. Other sites may have been in agricultural use before they <br />were commercially developed and could have residual herbicides or pesticides in the soil. <br />The need for clean-up on such sites has already been analyzed in the General Plan EIR and TOD strategy EIR. The <br />development proposed by the Housing Element is consistent with the development proposed by those plans in terms of <br />quantity (density) and location. No additional impacts are expected as a result of Housing Element adoption. The <br />General Plan EIR included mitigation measures to address the potential for adverse impacts. These measures <br />correspond to General Plan policies, including Policy 34.02 which requires clean-up prior to the development or reuse <br />of any contaminated site. The General Plan EIR also included a mitigation measure which requires a Phase I <br />environmental assessment prior to the redevelopment of any site where hazardous materials may be present. This <br />would apply to some of the housing opportunity sites that were previously used for agricultural, industrial, or heavier <br />commercial uses. <br />e) Housing Element adoption will not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working near areas covered by an <br />airport land use plan. The Element is consistent with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for Oakland <br />International Airport. Although there are long-established residential areas in the approach path to the North Field at <br />Oakland International Airport, none of the city's 86 housing sites are located in this area. Housing sites 10 and 86 are <br />located in the approach path to North Field but are in the Bayfair Mall Area which is four miles from the runway. <br />Consistent with the General Plan, any proposal to place housing in the area covered by the Airport Land Use Plan <br />would be coordinated through the Alameda County Airport Land Use Commission. Impacts resulting from anticipated <br />growth on airport-related hazards were addressed in the General Plan EIR; the Housing Element proposes no new or <br />increased impacts. <br />f) There are no private airstrips in or adjacent to San Leandro. <br />Housing Element Initial Study and Negative Declaration 17 February 2010 <br />