My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2010 0517
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
Packet 2010 0517
>
3A Public Hearing 2010 0517
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2010 10:58:22 AM
Creation date
5/14/2010 10:58:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
5/17/2010
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2010 0517
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2010\Packet 2010 0517
Reso 2010-054
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planiring Commission Special Meeting Minutes March 25, 2010 <br />Agenda No. 10-03 Puge 9 of 20 <br />people except for after school. Under Option B, he doesn't see how people will be able to get to <br />the Post Office with constraints on turns, and notes that four lanes of traffic will be reduced to <br />two. He said he simply cannot understand the mindset of anyone who would favor this. It will not <br />benefit anyone in the City. He said he does not see anyone from Bay-o-Vista, Washington Manor <br />or the area in which he lives, near Assumption parish, using BRT. He said he'd like to meet 10 <br />people in different areas who say they will use it. If we are going to have BRT in San Leandro, it <br />would be Option A, or better yet, forgetting it entirely also should be a consideration. <br />Principal Engineer Cooke pointed out that Option B includes a proposed new signal with left- <br />turn pocket at the Post Office. <br />Linda Perry, 1527 - 139th Avenue, said that she has been involved in BRT discussions since <br />1991 when she was on the City Council. As the past president of the Halcyon-Foothill <br />Neighborhood Association, she said they have opposed the dedicated lanes put forth for the south <br />area in every EIS/EIR that AC Transit has done in regard to these plans. Among the reasons: it <br />adds no service; the 1R is already enhanced. Dedicated lanes would interfere with fire and <br />ambulance service that comes up I43`d Avenue. The Post Office has been mentioned. It divides <br />the neighborhood by eliminating left turns. It will push traffic onto Bancroft Avenue from East <br />l4`~' Street. It will impact the safety of school children in particular, not only at McKinley School <br />but also at Jefferson Elementary School. South area businesses that are already struggling would <br />lose parking; most of them could not survive the impact of 18 months or more of construction. <br />The South Area Plan asked AC Transit for actual ridership figures, and decided against a <br />dedicated lane at that time, which was part of the reason the City opted to recommend terminating <br />BRT at the downtown San Leandro BART station. The Downtown Plan, the TOD Plan, the <br />LINKS shuttle all connect with this BART station. Thus, if we bring in BRT at all, she favors <br />Option A. The issue of cross-town connectivity remains to be resolved; she is interested to see <br />how the new routes work. Options to BRT such as car-sharing, additional shuttles should be <br />considered. <br />Charles Gilcrest, 1271 Terra Avenue, current president of the Halcyon-Foothill Neighborhood <br />Association and the Business Association of South San Leandro said that the staff had it right in <br />2006 in recommending that the City Council adopted an official position to terminate BRT at the <br />downtown San Leandro BART station. "It was magnificently reasoned and it was the right <br />decision," he said. The most significant thing to come out of 10 years' worth of hearings on this <br />matter is the silence - not a single resident or business owner has come forward in that time to <br />say dedicated lanes would cause them to ride BRT if they would not do so otherwise. Data <br />presented has been dubious. BRT proposes spending $15 million for dedicated lanes in the south <br />area increasing ridership by 1,900 a day. However, total hoardings would increase by 1,300. <br />When the hearings on BRT started in 2002, they said they wanted dedicated lanes to preserve the <br />right-of--way for future laying of rail. That will not happen because of the cost. City leaders have <br />basically opposed dedicated lanes over this whole period of time. <br />Dan Dillman, 14808 East 14th Street, owns the historic Bal Theatre. He wants it to be a beacon <br />of our City. He said that having dedicated lanes in the southern area would be destructive. Every <br />business owner that remains says it will damage their business and clog traffic. He sees the IR <br />every day, and sees very few riders. He said no people get off those buses to come to his <br />computer store or the theatre. AC Transit could instead upgrade existing bus stops and deal with <br />the problem of homeless people using them as shelters. Those areas seem to draw problems. <br />instead of solutions. If BRT starts tearing up the streets in front of the theatre, it would ruin the <br />great possibilities the area has for the near future and drive out even more businesses. At this <br />time, he believes doing nothing would be doing the best thing for the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.