My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2010 0517
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
Packet 2010 0517
>
3A Public Hearing 2010 0517
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2010 10:58:22 AM
Creation date
5/14/2010 10:58:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
5/17/2010
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2010 0517
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2010\Packet 2010 0517
Reso 2010-054
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Plrutning Conm2ission Special Meeting Minutes Marcit 25, 2010 <br />Agenda No. 10-03 Page 10 of 20 <br />Tom Combs, 61 Georgia Way, was a member of the joint resident-business North Area Task <br />Force that developed the recommendation for the current striping on the north part of East 14`x' <br />Street. The task force specifically adopted the two-way left-turn center lane because residents and <br />businesses alike needed it. The businesses use it heavily, because none of them have loading <br />docks or curbside loading areas, and residents need it to be able to cross from one side of East <br />14`x' Street to the other, particularly since few of the cross streets cross East 14`h in straight lines; <br />most of them zigzag. Instead of either Option A or Option B, Mr. Combs recommended the <br />Planning Commission and the City Council reaffirm the 2007 decision to recommend routes that <br />do not have dedicated bus lanes. He said it makes more sense to transition from dedicated lanes to <br />mixed lanes at a destination (such as Durant Square, just north of the monument), which would <br />also avoid the congestion of trying to run dedicated lanes past that point, because there is not <br />much right-of-way on either side of that monument. <br />Michael Wharton, 3661 Fairmount Avenue, Oakland, represents Congregations Organized for <br />Renewal (COR), spoke in favor of Alternative B. The Fruitvale District has the IR running right <br />through the center of it, and it is the most viable commercial area of Oakland. There is no reason <br />why that can't happen in the southern part of San Leandro, but it won't happen if BRT ends at the <br />downtown BART station. He noted that people who use the AC Transit system now are primarily <br />low-income families. They can use it for destination shopping at Bayfair; it is not at the <br />downtown TOD. There is also the theatre at Bayfair, which is a place for people to congregate. <br />He also says that the BRT access for people with disabilities is critical, and diverting it to the <br />downtown BART would cut out that option for them. At this time, he said, they have to transfer if <br />they want to go to Bayfair, and that creates more in-town bus traffic rather than alleviating it, <br />which makes it more difficult to achieve emission-reduction goals. <br />Vu-Banh Nguyen, a program coordinator at Urban Habitat, said that the idea behind BRT service <br />is to get people out of their cars, lower greenhouse gas emissions, get past the oil crisis -looking <br />towat°d the future with atransit-friendly environment. San Leandro already plays a role in that <br />with adoption of the TOD strategy. To say that BRT is "just a bus" undermines it. It is much <br />more. The dedicated lanes are very important. Once you have a robust, reliable, convenient and <br />fast bus system that people would want to take, people will use it. As a resident of Alameda, he <br />takes Line 51 daily. Like Mr. Wharton, he noted that the corridor that would benefit from BRT <br />service is 68percent minorities, so working on this study serves a major component of the <br />population. <br />Mike Rawlis, 964 Hutchings Drive, is a life-long San Leandro resident who says he doesn't like <br />the way AC Transit has taken away bus service from Davis Street, and how it is when they <br />change bus numbers. He also complains that buses accommodate only two bicycles, that bus <br />service stops before 7 p.m., and that there is so little cross-town service available. <br />Flint Evans, 1615 Graff Court, lives in Bay-o-Vista on the east end of town and has a business <br />on the west end, so he has to cross the East 14th Street corridor and therefore would not be happy <br />with Option B's hindrance of east-west traffic flow. While Option A doesn't bother him <br />personally, he understands the problems Ms. Combs described. He also is disturbed that BRT has <br />been on the table for more than a decade. We turn it away and it keeps coming back. <br />Hendy Huang, 463 Estudillo Avenue, shops on East 14th Street. BRT would not be good for <br />businesses there. Shoppers cannot accumulate a lot of purchases going from store to store and <br />then expect to get their shopping bags on the bus. He said he has more than 20 bags to carry. He <br />is also concerned about getting around accidents in the area if one lane is dedicated to buses only. <br />He concluded by saying, "Don't take our driving space, please." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.