Reso 2001-020 RDA 2001-002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

POTENTIALLY ISSUES POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS THAN NO SIGNIFICANT UNLESS SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SOURCES ISSUES MITIGATION IMPACT INCORPORATED e. For a project located within an airport land use X 2 plan, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? £ For a project within the vicinity of a private X 2 airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the ro'ect area? g. Impair implementation of or physically X 2 interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk X 2 of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? EXPLANATION: The project area is largely developed and can be described as an urban environment. It is possible that through either future development of currently vacant parcels, or future redevelopment of properties, hazardous materials maybe encountered either in the soils, or above/below ground in containers. Because site-specific information is not available at this time, the following mitigation measure is recommended in order to reduce to a less than significant level potential impacts related to hazardous materials in relation to future development in the project area: • Prior to issuance of grading permits for site-specific development projects, and at the discretion of the Development Services Director and/or the Environmental Services Manager, a Phase I Environmental Assessment shall be submitted for review and approval by the Environmental Services Manager. Any recommendations for remediation contained in the Environmental Assessment shall become conditions of approval for the proposed project and shall be indicated as such on the plans submitted for approval of grading or building permits. Any future uses that locate to the project area that utilize hazardous materials in their day-to-day business, shall be required to comply with all local, state, and federal agencies, regulations regarding the use and storage of such materials, thus this potential impact is anticipated to be less than significant. The project area is not within an airport land use plan, therefore no impacts are anticipated. In addition, no impacts are anticipated regarding established emergency plans and the project area is not subject to wildland fires as it is highly urbanized. 9.,NQISE. 'Would the ro'ect result in: a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise X 2 levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinances, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of X 2 excessive groundborne vibration of roundborne noise levels? c. A substantial permanent increase in X 2 ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existin without the ro'ect? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in X 2 ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existin without the ro'ect? e. For a project located within an airport land use X 2 plan, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? CSLBART Revitalization Strategy - IS/ND 10 December/2000